Back

Clinical and molecular characterization of an outbreak of leptospirosis in dogs from Los Angeles County, California, USA, 2021

Randolph, M. W.; Nally, J. E.; Yoshimoto, S.; Chow, B.; Wagner, D. M.; Stone, N. E.; Sahl, J. W.; Hamond, C.; LeCount, K.; Stuber, T.; van der Linden, H.; Reagan, K. L.; Schrieber, A.; Sebastian, J.; Sykes, J. E.

2026-03-25 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.24.706307 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn 2021, the Los Angeles County (LAC) Department of Public Health suspected a leptospirosis outbreak in LAC affecting over 200 client-owned dogs. ObjectiveTo characterize the outbreak and describe microbiologic findings, risk factors, diagnostic test performance, and outcomes in dogs diagnosed with leptospirosis at two specialty practices. MethodsLeptospira culture isolates from four cases were subjected to serotyping and whole genome sequencing (WGS); WGS was also performed on one enriched genome isolate. After the outbreak, data were gathered on 59 cases through record review and compared to the background hospital population (controls, n=15,536). ResultsAll isolates were Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola, but each was distinct based on WGS. Cases clustered in space and in time. Cases evaluated during the outbreak peak had increased odds of exposure to indoor congregate facilities (ICFs). None of 47 dogs with known leptospirosis vaccination history were completely vaccinated. Leptospira real-time PCR on blood and urine and initial serologic testing using the microscopic agglutination test and point-of-care tests were positive in 15/56 (27%), 49/54 (91%) dogs, 22/29 (76%), and 27/35 (77%) dogs respectively. Fifty-four (92%) of 59 dogs survived to discharge; some remained azotemic. No associated human cases were identified. Conclusions and Clinical ImportanceL. interrogans serovar Canicola was associated with a leptospirosis outbreak in unvaccinated dogs from LAC, which had public health implications given widespread dog ownership rates. Data analysis suggested multiple infection sources, including ICFs. Urine PCR was the most sensitive diagnostic test. Such outbreaks might be prevented through more widespread vaccination.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
13.9%
2
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
13.9%
3
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
5
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.1%
8
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
9
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
10
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
12
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
13
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
16
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%