Investigating the Impact of Sex on Outcomes in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

BackgroundJuvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) shows recognised sex differences, but their impact on treatment and early outcomes remains uncertain. This study assesses sex-specific patterns in onset, phenotype, treatment timing, and short- and medium-term outcomes in JIA. MethodsData were drawn from the Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study (CAPS), a UK multicentre inception cohort of 1,789 children presenting with a new episode of arthritis. Demographics, subtype distribution, clinical features, and 6- and 12-month outcomes were stratified by sex. Cox, Kaplan-Meier, and linear regression models assessed associations between sex and treatment initiation and 12-month outcomes. ResultsThe cohort was predominantly female (64.3%), with a median age at symptom onset of 6.8 years. Girls were younger than boys at onset (6.1 vs 7.8 years, p<0.0001) and diagnosis (7.0 vs 9.1 years, p<0.0001) and demonstrated a distinct bimodal age distribution. Diagnostic delay was short and comparable (median 4.4 months, p=0.8932). At diagnosis, girls had slightly higher active joint counts (p=0.0080, while inflammatory markers were similar except in psoriatic JIA, where females had higher ESR and CRP. After adjustment, sex was not associated with time to methotrexate (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.74-1.06) or biologic initiation (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.72-1.16). Outcomes at 6- and 12-month were largely comparable, with only ESR showing a modest male-favoured improvement at 12 months (p=0.0480). ConclusionsSex shaped age at onset and subtype distribution but did not independently influence treatment timing or early outcomes, underscoring the value of sex-aware analyses while confirming broadly comparable short-term trajectories in JIA. Evidence before this studyRecent evidence on sex effects in JIA is genuinely mixed: several cohorts have reported that girls, despite more severe onset, show greater resolution of objective inflammation, while a newer, large network analysis found females had poorer outcomes across composite disease activity and pain, pointing to potential inequities or phenotype-driven differences. In parallel, boys, especially in enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA), often exhibit more persistent activity and risk of damage. Overall, the picture is controversial: sex appears to shape biology, trajectory, and patient-reported burden in different ways across subtypes and settings, reinforcing the need for sex-stratified analyses, careful adjustment for confounders, and precision approaches that integrate biomarkers, subtype, and social context in JIA care. Added value of this studyThe study establishes that, although sex is closely linked to JIA subtype distribution and baseline clinical features, it does not independently determine the timing of methotrexate or biologic initiation within a UK inception cohort. By analysing one of Europes largest prospective multicentre datasets, it provides strong evidence that treatment decisions appear to be guided by disease characteristics rather than demographic bias. Within the context of the UK National Health Service (NHS), where universal access to paediatric rheumatology care is a core principle, this study provides important epidemiological evidence on sex and equity in JIA. Although clear sex differences were observed in age at onset, subtype distribution, and certain diagnostic features, these did not translate into disparities in treatment timing or medium-term disease burden. The absence of sex-based differences in 6 and 12-month outcomes, despite variation in baseline presentation, suggests that the NHS model of coordinated, guideline-driven care may help buffer against inequities that might otherwise emerge in systems with variable access. These findings reinforce the value of population-based cohorts in evaluating equity within healthcare delivery and highlight that, in this setting, sex does not appear to drive differential treatment or short-term clinical trajectories. Implications of all the available evidence.This study underscores sex as an important biological variable in JIA. Although treatment initiation was equitable and disease-driven, baseline phenotype differences and isolated effects on 12-month outcomes highlight how sex interacts with JIA subtype and initial disease burden. Prior work shows that females often present earlier with higher inflammatory burden, while males are more frequently affected by ERA, a subtype linked to treatment resistance and poorer long-term outcomes. Yet published findings remain inconsistent, with some cohorts reporting better resolution of inflammation in females and others suggesting poorer outcomes. Our findings suggest that coordinated and guideline-driven care may minimise sex-related disparities in JIA, even when underlying biological or phenotypic differences exist. The comparable medium-term trajectories observed across sexes support equitable paediatric rheumatology care in the UK and highlight the need to continue monitoring for structural or access-related inequities beyond clinical measures.