Behavioral Risk Identification and Decision Guidance for Engagement (BRIDGE): Research protocol for an evaluation of an HIV treatment retention toolkit for the early treatment period
Sande, L.; Maskew, M.; Mutanda, N.; Kuchingwe, E.; Morgan, A.; Ntijekelane, V.; Chiwaye, S.; Benade, M.; Marri, A. R.; Malala, L.; Manganye, M.; Rosen, S.; Scott, N. A.
Show abstract
Background Interruptions in HIV care pose a major challenge to achieving HIV control goals in many countries, with 30% of clients who initiate antiretroviral therapy (ART) in South Africa experiencing an interruption of >28 days during their first six months on treatment. South Africa introduced revised guidelines in 2023 to improve outcomes during this early treatment period, but guideline compliance remains incomplete and gaps in the support provided to both clients and providers to optimize service delivery and health outcomes. Protocol BRIDGE (Behavioral Risk Identification and Decision Guidance for Engagement) is a mixed-methods evaluation of a package of light-touch, low-cost interventions aimed at improving the experiences of both clients and providers of care, increasing compliance with the 2023 guidelines, supporting clients to remain in care, and ultimately reducing the incidence of missed visits during the early treatment period. Components of the BRIDGE Retention Toolkit include an intervention navigator to help clients self-assess areas of vulnerability for disengagement from care and identify appropriate interventions; client roadmap to explain the treatment journey for the early treatment period; WhatsApp-based counseling tool for clients; guideline reference for providers; and tracing job aids. The tookit will be piloted at 6-8 public sector primary health facilities for a one-month period. The primary outcome will be the probability of returning less than 28 days late for the next scheduled clinic visit, assessed using electronic medical record data for the pilot and comparison sites. Pilot outcomes will be compared to both their own probabilities prior to the pilot and to probabilities from comparable non-pilot facilities. Implementation outcomes to be assessed using qualitative interview data from both clients and providers will include reach, implementation fidelity, adoption (uptake), costs, feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability. Discussion The evaluation will assess the implementation and preliminary effectiveness of a set of interventions designed to improve client outcomes during the early HIV treatment period. If some or all of the BRIDGE tools are found to be helpful and/or are associated with a reduction in missed clinic visits, they will comprise a readily scalable and affordable intervention to help address a major barrier in large-scale HIV treatment programs.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- “It reminds me and motivates me” : Human-centered design and implementation of an interactive, SMS-based digital intervention to improve early retention on antiretroviral therapy: usability and acceptability among new initiates in a high-volume, public clinic in Malawi 97%
- Strengthening health system’s capacity for pre-exposure Prophylaxis for adolescent girls and young women and adolescent boys and young men in South Africa (SHeS’Cap – PrEP): Protocol for a mixed methods study in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa 97%
- Strengthening Health System’s Capacity for Linkage to HIV Care for adolescent girls and young women and adolescent boys and young men in South Africa (SheS’Cap-Linkage): Protocol for a mixed methods study in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Provider preferences for delivery of HIV care coordination services: results from a discrete choice experiment 96%
- Clinical outcomes after extended 12-month antiretroviral therapy prescriptions in a community-based differentiated HIV service delivery programme in South Africa: a retrospective cohort study 95%
- An evaluation of assumptions underlying respondent-driven sampling and the social contexts of sexual and gender minority youth participating in HIV clinical trials in the United States 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a qualitative study exploring the experiences and perceptions of dolutegravir/lamivudine dual antiretroviral therapy (the PEDAL Study) in people living with HIV 96%
- Scalability of mobile technology interventions in the prevention and management of HIV among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review 95%
- Symptoms of common mental disorders and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among adults living with HIV in rural Zimbabwe: a cross-sectional study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The SENTINEL study of differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment in Malawi, South Africa, and Zambia: research protocol for a prospective cohort study 97%
- Reduction in initiations of HIV treatment in South Africa during the COVID pandemic 95%
- A community-based participatory research approach to the development, refinement, and distribution of Test-to-PrEP: A peer-to-peer distributed at-home HIV self-test and prevention information kit in Miami-Dade, Florida 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Behaviourally-informed two-way text messaging to improve return to HIV care in South Africa: evidence from a randomised controlled trial 97%
- Undetectable=untransmittable (U=U) messaging increases uptake of HIV testing among men: Results from a pilot cluster randomized trial 96%
- Community-Based Accompaniment for Adolescents Transitioning to Adult HIV Care in Urban Peru: a Pilot Study 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.