Back

Performance Assessment of ECG Delineators on Single-Lead Wearable Ambulatory Data

Chuma, A. T.; Youssef, A. S.; Asmare, M. H.; Wang, C.; Kassie, D. M.; Voigt, J.-U.; Vanrumste, B.

2026-03-26 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.03.24.26349185 medRxiv
Show abstract

Reliable interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs) requires precise identification of P, QRS, and T (PQRST) wave boundaries. However, it remains challenging due to noise, signal quality variability, and inherent morphological diversity particularly in recordings from children. This study systematically compares the performance of leading deep neural networks (DNN) and heuristic-based delineation algorithms on ambulatory single-lead ECG signals focusing on temporal accuracy. Experiments were conducted using the publicly available LUDB dataset and a private validation dataset comprising 21,759 annotated single-lead wave segments from 611 children recorded using KardiaMobile ECG sensor. DNN were first trained on the LUDB dataset and subsequently tested on the validation dataset. The delineation performance was assessed using Sensitivity (Se) and positive-predictive-value (P+) metrics. The best-performing heuristic based and DNN models reached Se and P+ of (98.9% vs 97.9%) for P, (99.8% vs 99.2%) for QRS, and (98.7% vs 95.9%) for T wave fiducials, respectively. The lowest standard-deviation (in ms) of wave onset/offset delineation was achieved by attention based 1DU-Net model; {+/-}16.6/{+/-}16.3 for P-wave, {+/-}14.0/{+/-}16.3 for QRS, and {+/-}26.3/{+/-}18.8 for T-wave, respectively. The findings indicate that optimized heuristic models can perform comparably to complex DNN, highlighting their efficiency and suitability for real-time ECG delineation in digital health monitoring applications.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.5%
6
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
14
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
24
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
25
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
26
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%