Symptom-specific genetics reveal heterogeneity within major depressive disorder
Goula, A. A.; Huider, F.; Hottenga, J.-J.; Pasman, J. A.; Bot, M.; Rietman, M. L.; t'Hart, L. M.; Rutters, F.; Blom, M. T.; Rhebergen, D.; Visser, M.; Hartman, C. A.; Oldehinkel, A. J.; de Geus, E. J. C.; Franke, B.; Picavet, H. S. J.; Verschuren, W. M. M.; van Loo, H. M.; Boomsma, D. I.; Penninx, B. W.; Milaneschi, Y.
Show abstract
Background Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is clinically and biologically heterogeneous. Here, we leveraged the genetics of individual depressive symptoms to dissect the disorder's underlying heterogeneity. Methods We utilized the BIObanks Netherlands Internet Collaboration (BIONIC). A series of genome-wide association studies (effective-N range: 14,407-47,110) compared controls (N=48,286) with partially different subsets of lifetime MDD cases (range: 3,892-15,577), each endorsing one of 12 individual DSM-based depressive symptoms. Results were combined in genetic correlations that informed factor analyses with Genomic Structural Equation Modeling, decomposing underlying MDD liability dimensions. The identified factors were assessed and further characterized using multivariate regression of neurodevelopmental/psychiatric and cardiometabolic traits. Results All symptoms demonstrated substantial SNP-based heritability (h2SNP:0.088-0.127). Despite high between-symptom genetic correlations, factor analyses yielded two highly correlated (rg=0.85) but still distinct latent factors: factor 1 (F1), capturing appetite/weight loss, insomnia, guilt/worthlessness, psychomotor slowing and suicidality, and factor 2 (F2), reflecting concentration problems, anhedonia, depressed mood, appetite/weight gain and fatigue. Overall, F1 had a stronger genetic overlap with neurodevelopmental/psychiatric phenotypes (e.g., autism: standardized estimate {beta}=0.45, p=4.49 x10-; schizophrenia: {beta}=0.40, p=1.73x10-), while F2 significantly overlapped with cardiometabolic traits (e.g., metabolic syndrome: {beta}=0.44, p=8.69x10-; coronary artery disease: {beta}=0.31, p=0.009). Conclusions We identified two genetic dimensions of MDD, each linked to partially distinct clinical manifestations and underlying biology, with one reflecting neurodevelopmental/psychiatric liabilities and the other capturing a strong cardiometabolic vulnerability. Disentangling such distinct dimensions may help guide patient stratification and targeted treatment, thereby advancing precision psychiatry.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel polygenic risk score as a translational tool linking depression-related changes in the corticolimbic transcriptome with neural face processing and anhedonic symptoms 96%
- Acylcarnitines metabolism in depression: association with diagnostic status, depression severity and symptom profile in the NESDA cohort 96%
- Role of Inflammation in Depressive and Anxiety Disorders, Affect, and Cognition: Genetic and Non-Genetic Findings in the Lifelines Cohort Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide association analysis reveals extensive genetic overlap between mood instability and psychiatric disorders but divergent patterns of genetic effects 97%
- Multi-polygenic scores in psychiatry: from disorder-specific to transdiagnostic perspectives 96%
- Polygenic risk scores for psychiatric, inflammatory, and cardio-metabolic traits and diseases highlight possible genetic overlaps with suicide attempt and treatment-emergent suicidal ideation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reproducible Risk Loci and Psychiatric Comorbidities in Anxiety: Results from ~200,000 Million Veteran Program Participants 94%
- Pervasively thinner neocortex as a transdiagnostic feature of general psychopathology 94%
- Multivariate GWAS elucidates the genetic architecture of alcohol consumption and misuse, corrects biases, and reveals novel associations with disease 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.