Back

Symptom-specific genetics reveal heterogeneity within major depressive disorder

Goula, A. A.; Huider, F.; Hottenga, J.-J.; Pasman, J. A.; Bot, M.; Rietman, M. L.; t'Hart, L. M.; Rutters, F.; Blom, M. T.; Rhebergen, D.; Visser, M.; Hartman, C. A.; Oldehinkel, A. J.; de Geus, E. J. C.; Franke, B.; Picavet, H. S. J.; Verschuren, W. M. M.; van Loo, H. M.; Boomsma, D. I.; Penninx, B. W.; Milaneschi, Y.

2026-03-25 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.03.24.26349158 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is clinically and biologically heterogeneous. Here, we leveraged the genetics of individual depressive symptoms to dissect the disorder's underlying heterogeneity. Methods We utilized the BIObanks Netherlands Internet Collaboration (BIONIC). A series of genome-wide association studies (effective-N range: 14,407-47,110) compared controls (N=48,286) with partially different subsets of lifetime MDD cases (range: 3,892-15,577), each endorsing one of 12 individual DSM-based depressive symptoms. Results were combined in genetic correlations that informed factor analyses with Genomic Structural Equation Modeling, decomposing underlying MDD liability dimensions. The identified factors were assessed and further characterized using multivariate regression of neurodevelopmental/psychiatric and cardiometabolic traits. Results All symptoms demonstrated substantial SNP-based heritability (h2SNP:0.088-0.127). Despite high between-symptom genetic correlations, factor analyses yielded two highly correlated (rg=0.85) but still distinct latent factors: factor 1 (F1), capturing appetite/weight loss, insomnia, guilt/worthlessness, psychomotor slowing and suicidality, and factor 2 (F2), reflecting concentration problems, anhedonia, depressed mood, appetite/weight gain and fatigue. Overall, F1 had a stronger genetic overlap with neurodevelopmental/psychiatric phenotypes (e.g., autism: standardized estimate {beta}=0.45, p=4.49 x10-; schizophrenia: {beta}=0.40, p=1.73x10-), while F2 significantly overlapped with cardiometabolic traits (e.g., metabolic syndrome: {beta}=0.44, p=8.69x10-; coronary artery disease: {beta}=0.31, p=0.009). Conclusions We identified two genetic dimensions of MDD, each linked to partially distinct clinical manifestations and underlying biology, with one reflecting neurodevelopmental/psychiatric liabilities and the other capturing a strong cardiometabolic vulnerability. Disentangling such distinct dimensions may help guide patient stratification and targeted treatment, thereby advancing precision psychiatry.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
2
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.0%
4
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
5
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
6
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
8
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
9
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
10
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
11
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
12
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
13
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
16
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
18
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
19
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
20
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
22
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
24
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%