Accelerated cancer registration from the National Disease Registration Service to support the NHS-Galleri trial
Eversfield, C.; Petersen, N.; Smittenaar, R.; Liang, W.; Rocha, C.; Harrop, L.; Graham, K.; Dilling, N.; Tulloch, O.; Lloyd, D.; Sasieni, P.; Rous, B.; Bomb, M.; McPhail, S.
Show abstract
Purpose: High-quality population-based cancer registration data is crucial for cancer research. We describe the methodology that the National Disease Registration Service (NDRS) established to accelerate provision of cancer registration data in England to support timely analysis of the NHS-Galleri trial (NCT05611632), assessing the clinical utility of a multi-cancer early detection test for population screening. Methods: NDRS established two accelerated cancer registration products for trial participants: Expedited Core (providing complete stage data 6 months after diagnosis) and Expedited Comprehensive (providing [≥]6 months of follow-up clinical pathway data 11 months after diagnosis). NDRS used pre-existing data sources and methodology, plus enhanced dedicated data liaison support. Timeliness and concordance of accelerated data was assessed 6, 11, and [≥]19 months after diagnosis. Results: At 6-10 months after diagnosis, most (98.0%) registrations achieved Expedited Core status; at >10 months, all (100%) registrations were Expedited Comprehensive. For fact of malignant cancer and stage III/IV diagnoses, concordance between registrations at 6 and [≥]19 months was 96.7% and 95.6%, respectively. Conclusions: NDRS delivered staged cancer registration data 6 months after diagnosis. High concordance at 6, 11, and 19 months provides confidence in the accelerated data. This supports reporting NHS-Galleri findings more promptly than possible via routine data.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: a structured protocol 94%
- Exploring scalable assessment methods for terminated trials in ClinicalTrials.gov: A cohort analysis of German and Californian trials 93%
- Investigating the use of a one-page infographic to improve recruitment and retention to the BASIL+ Randomised Controlled Trial: A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Results dissemination from clinical trials conducted at German university medical centres was delayed and incomplete 93%
- Results reporting for clinical trials led by medical universities and university hospitals in the Nordic countries was often missing or delayed 92%
- Strength of Statistical Evidence for the Efficacy of Cancer Drugs: A Bayesian Re-Analysis of Trials Supporting FDA Approval 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychological Impact of the Galleri Test (sIG(n)al): Protocol for a longitudinal evaluation of the psychological impact of receiving a cancer signal in the NHS-Galleri Trial 93%
- CATALYST trial protocol: A multicentre, open-label, phase II, multi-arm trial for an early and accelerated evaluation of the potential treatments for COVID-19 in hospitalised adults 91%
- Public opinion on sharing data from UK health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort profile: Virus Watch: Understanding community incidence, symptom profiles, and transmission of COVID-19 in relation to population movement and behaviour 91%
- Comparative effectiveness of different primary vaccination courses on mRNA based booster vaccines against SARs-COV-2 infections: A time-varying cohort analysis using trial emulation in the Virus Watch community cohort 90%
- Quantifying absolute treatment effect heterogeneity for time-to-event outcomes across different risk strata: divergence of conclusions with risk difference and restricted mean survival difference 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- UKCTOCS Update: Applying insights of delayed effects in cancer screening trials to the long-term follow-up mortality analysis 94%
- Trials that turn from retrospectively registered to prospectively registered: A cohort study of ‘retroactively prospective’ clinical trial registration using history data 93%
- Development and evaluation of rapid data-enabled access to routine clinical information to enhance early recruitment to the national clinical platform trial of COVID-19 community treatments 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.