Back

Visualize, Explore, and Select: A protein Language Model-based Approach Enabling Navigation of Protein Sequence Space for Enzyme Discovery and Mining

Moorhoff, F.; Medina-Ortiz, D.; Kotnis, A.; Hassanin, A.; D. Davari, M.

2026-03-25 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.23.712833 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The rapid expansion of protein sequence databases continues to outpace functional characterization, creating a persistent bottleneck in enzyme discovery and mining--particularly in large, heterogeneous, and sparsely annotated sequence spaces. This gap is amplified by visualization challenges and the lack of informed strategies for exploration, selection, and mining across sequence spaces. Here, we present an embedding-based workflow, implemented in a computational platform called SelectZyme, for alignment-free visualization and exploration of protein sequence space that combines protein language model (pLM) representations with dimensionality reduction and hierarchical density-based clustering. The approach links complementary visualizations of protein sequence space as low-dimensional landscapes, connectivity projections (minimum spanning trees), and dendrogram-based organization, enabling coherent interactive exploration and candidate selection across global context and local neighborhoods without relying on sequence-identity thresholds, EC numbers, conserved motifs, or predefined functional annotations. Across distinct case studies, we demonstrate that embedding-defined neighborhoods remain structurally conserved even when sequence identity falls within the twilight zone, and that coherent functional organization emerges also for modular protein segments in a fully unsupervised analysis. We also show how this workflow supports user friendly, interactive and scalable enzyme mining in a sparsely annotated, complex multi-family protein space surpassing > 100,000 sequences, enabling constrained candidate selection around experimentally validated anchors. By enabling interactive exploration across visualizations, supporting informed candidate selection, our workflow streamlines biocatalyst discovery and helps to bridge uncharacterized sequence-space to functional characterization campaigns - thus providing a broad starting point to downstream protein engineering, machine-learning-guided design cycles, and iterative experimental screening campaigns.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.4%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 21%
9.0%
3
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
4
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.7%
5
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
6
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
8
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
9
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
11
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.1%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
15
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
18
Journal of Cheminformatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
20
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
23
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
27
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%