Back

Medium-term Prediction of Clinically-relevant Outcomes in First-episode Schizophrenia Patients

Bakstein, E.; Kudelka, J.; Schneider, J.; Slovakova, A.; Fialova, M.; Ihln, M.; Furstova, P.; Hlinka, J.; Spaniel, F.

2026-03-25 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.03.23.26349083 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUND: Predicting long-term outcomes in first-episode schizophrenia (FES) remains difficult, despite being especially important early in the illness, when timely intervention is most critical. Many potential predictors have been studied, but few are reliable enough to guide early treatment decisions. It also remains unclear how much data from the initial phase of illness is required to improve prognostic accuracy. METHODS: We analysed 68 patients with first-episode schizophrenia (FES) assessed at baseline (V1; mean 0.5 years post-onset, YPO), one-year follow-up (V2; mean 1.2 YPO), and outcome (V3; mean 4.9 YPO). We trained elastic-net models to predict three V3 outcomes-negative symptoms (PANSS Negative factor; Wallwork/Fortgang), global functioning (GAF), and quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF psychological domain)-using either 23 V1 predictors alone or V1 predictors plus V2 data (43 predictors). Performance was evaluated with nested cross-validation on held-out data. RESULTS: Using predictors from the first year (V1+V2), we achieved statistically significant out-of-sample prediction for all three V3 outcomes: PANSS Negative factor (Wallwork/Fortgang) R2=0.22 driven mainly by log(DUP), PANSS Negative at V1/V2, and PANSS Disorganized at V2; WHOQOL-BREF Psychological Health R2=0.22 driven mainly by WHOQOL Psychological Health at V2 and GAF at V2; and GAF R2=0.14 driven mainly by GAF at V2, PANSS Positive at V2, WHOQOL Psychological Health at V2, and hospitalization burden (before V1 and between V1-V2). With baseline-only predictors (V1), only PANSS Negative showed meaningful predictive power (R2=0.15); GAF and WHOQOL-BREF did not outperform the intercept-only baseline. CONCLUSION: In FES, long-term functioning (GAF) and quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) can not be predicted well from first-episode (V1) measures; at least an additional 1 year of follow-up is needed, implying these outcomes are driven by changes after onset that V1 misses. Negative symptoms differ: they are comparatively stable after initial antipsychotic treatment, and duration of untreated psychosis is their strongest predictor beyond baseline severity-consistent with early biology and treatment timing shaping their level and persistence. These contrasting patterns indicate different outcome phenotypes.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.4%
2
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Schizophrenia
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
6
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
7
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.3%
10
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
11
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
18
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
24
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%