Back

Development of the Susceptibility-Spectrum Discrepancy Index (S2DI): A novel metric for antimicrobial stewardship in hospitalised patients

Tsuzuki, S.; Koizumi, R.; Asai, Y.; Hashimoto, Y.; Inoue, N.; Ohmagari, N.

2026-03-25 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.03.23.26349044 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: Optimising parenteral antimicrobial use is central to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) control, yet its appropriateness is difficult to assess. We aimed to develop a quantitative indicator to evaluate the appropriateness of parenteral antimicrobial therapy in hospitalised patients with bloodstream infections. Methods: We developed the Susceptibility-Spectrum Discrepancy Index (S2DI), reflecting the discrepancy between antimicrobial susceptibility of blood culture isolates and the spectrum width of prescribed agents. Using a database from 67 National Hospital Organization hospitals in Japan, we identified patients with Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli bacteraemia from 2017 to 2023. An expert panel of 10 infectious disease physicians independently ranked antimicrobial susceptibility (A) and spectrum width of commonly used agents (B). S2DI was defined as B minus A on day 7 after treatment initiation, with values closer to zero indicating more appropriate therapy. S2DI was calculated for individual cases, aggregated at the hospital level, and analysed using linear mixed-effects models with hospital-level random effects. Results: A total of 4,505 S. aureus and 9,563 E. coli bacteraemia cases were included. Median S2DI was 1 (IQR 0-1) for S. aureus and 2 (IQR 0-3) for E. coli. For both pathogens, later calendar years were significantly associated with more favourable S2DI, suggesting gradual improvement in antimicrobial use. In E. coli bacteraemia, female sex and younger age were also associated with more appropriate therapy. Conclusions: Although variation across hospitals persists, appropriateness of parenteral antimicrobial use has improved over time. S2DI is a simple metric that may support optimisation of antimicrobial use.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.6%
2
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
5
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
7
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
8
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
10
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
13
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
15
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
18
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
22
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
25
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
27
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%