Back

Challenges and perspectives in implementing whole-exome sequencing in Algeria lessons from a fully autonomous in-country cohort

AIT MOUHOUB, T.; BELADGHAM, K.; BRAHIMI, S.; GAGI, N.; MIHOUBI, A.; MOUTCHACHOU, H.; BOUABID, M. E. A.; BELAID, A.; YAHIAOUI, S.; BELAZZOUGUI, D.; IMESSAOUDENE, B.

2026-03-25 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.03.23.26348909 medRxiv
Show abstract

Despite the multidimensional value of implementing genomic medicine, in terms of diagnostic yield, cost-effectiveness, and optimisation of care trajectories, its deployment in many African countries, including Algeria, remains constrained by major structural and interpretive challenges, compounded by the persistent underrepresentation of African populations in genomic databases with direct consequences for variant interpretation and clinical decision-making. We implemented a fully in-house whole-exome sequencing (WES) workflow structured through a clinically driven sequential framework in 14 unrelated patients with unexplained neurodevelopmental disorders, in a context of high consanguinity and enriched recessive inheritance. A definitive molecular diagnosis was established in 8 cases, with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants identified in MECP2, PTPN11, FOXG1, ARV1, GNAO1, ATM, ROBO3, and CHD3. Five cases yielded variants of uncertain significance and one clinically relevant incidental finding was identified. Beyond its diagnostic contribution, this study reveals persistent interpretive limitations: a disproportionate VUS burden, complex incidental finding management, and reduced accessibility to classification criteria, reflecting database underrepresentation, the predominance of private variants, and the limits of current frameworks in consanguineous settings. These findings underscore the necessity of population-specific reference datasets, iterative phenotyping, adapted ethical frameworks, and strategies addressing territorial disparities in access. This work demonstrates that WES implementation requires a structured multidisciplinary ecosystem integrating clinical, bioinformatic, and ethical dimensions, and provides a transferable model for the sustainable integration of genomic medicine in under-resourced settings, while highlighting the global scientific value of incorporating underrepresented populations into genomic research.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.9%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
4
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
5
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
7
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
12
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
14
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
15
Genetics in Medicine Open
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
16
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
17
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
20
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
21
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%