Back

Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA Metagenomic Sequencing Bridges Gaps in the Diagnosis, Epidemiology and Surveillance of Legionella Infections

Nolte, F. S.; Lindner, M. S.; Venkatasubrahmanyam, S.; Pickens, C.; Lim, L.; Hsu, V. P.; Park, S. Y.; Perkins, B. A.; Wunderink, R. G.

2026-03-26 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.03.23.26348694 medRxiv
Show abstract

Conventional diagnostic methods (CDM) for Legionella preferentially detect L. pneumophila and frequently fail to identify non-pneumophila species (NPLS), obscuring the full clinical spectrum of infection and limiting surveillance accuracy. We analyzed plasma microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing detections of Legionella spp. from a large clinical cohort tested between 2018 and 2024 and compared species distributions with culture and PCR confirmed cases reported in the most recent national surveillance datasets (2018-2021). To contextualize the clinical impact, we reviewed published reports in which mcfDNA sequencing was used to diagnose legionellosis (2021-2025) and evaluated real-world performance data from a hospital contributing 8.9% of detections within the cohort (Hospital A). mcfDNA sequencing identified proportionally fewer L. pneumophila, more NPLS, and fewer unresolved species than the CDC reports (all p<0.001). Among 15 publications describing 19 U.S. patients, 74% were immunocompromised and 79% had NPLS infections. Concordance between mcfDNA and CDM occurred in 31.6% of cases. At Hospital A with 36 detections, diagnosis was established by CDM alone in none, by both CDM and mcfDNA in 23.5%, and by mcfDNA alone in 76.5%, yielding an additive diagnostic value of 56.8% These findings suggest that plasma mcfDNA sequencing may improve detection of NPLS particularly in high-risk or diagnostically challenging patients and provide complementary data for both clinical diagnosis and epidemiologic surveillance.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.