Meta-analytic Evidence for Four Amplifier Loops in Chronic Pain Chronification: Development of the Pain Amplifier Loop Framework (PALF) Risk Score
Arranz-Duran, J.
Show abstract
Objective: To quantify the effect size of four biopsychosocial amplifier loops on chronic pain outcomes through systematic review and meta-analysis, and to develop a logistic regression-based risk stratification tool for interventional pain medicine. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library through March 2026 for studies reporting adjusted odds ratios for associations between (1) sleep disturbance, (2) pain catastrophizing, (3) metabolic/inflammatory markers, (4) preoperative opioid use/polypharmacy, and chronic pain chronification or treatment failure. Random-effects meta-analyses (DerSimonian-Laird) were performed for each loop. Effect sizes were translated into a composite logistic regression model, the Pain Amplifier Loop Framework (PALF), using ln(OR) as first-order coefficient approximations. Results: Forty-four studies with over 500,000 participants were included. Pooled odds ratios were: sleep disturbance OR=1.80 (95% CI 1.65-1.96; k=16), pain catastrophizing OR=2.11 (95% CI 1.71-2.61; k=8), metabolic/fat mass OR=2.02 (95% CI 1.32-3.09; k=7), preoperative opioid use OR=4.48 (95% CI 2.87-6.97; k=6), and opioid-benzodiazepine co-prescription OR=2.62 (95% CI 1.76-3.89; k=7). All four loops converge on TLR4/NF-kB microglial signaling. The PALF model produces a probability of interventional failure enabling stratification into low, moderate, and high risk categories. Conclusions: Four amplifier loops independently increase chronic pain risk. The PALF provides a transparent, clinically actionable risk score requiring prospective validation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Power and Accuracy in Randomized Controlled Trials of Pain Treatments by Accounting for Concurrent Analgesic Use 94%
- Management of Central Post-Stroke Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 94%
- A shared genetic signature for common chronic pain conditions and its impact on biopsychosocial traits 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond Black vs White: Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Chronic Pain including Hispanic, Asian, Native American, and Multiracial U.S. Adults 95%
- Migraine Disability, Pain Catastrophizing, And Headache Severity Are Associated With Evoked Pain And Targeted By Mind-Body Therapy 94%
- Cortical function and sensorimotor plasticity predict future low back pain after an acute episode: the UPWaRD prospective cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Short-term variability of chronic musculoskeletal pain 94%
- Autonomic Nervous System Markers of Music-Elicited Analgesia in People with Fibromyalgia: A Double-Blind Randomized Pilot Study 93%
- Tissue damage-induced axon injury-associated responses in sensory neurons - requirements, prevention, and potential role in persistent post-surgical pain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting Post-operative Pain in Lung Cancer Patients using Pre-operative Peak Alpha Frequency 92%
- Causal evidence linking chronic pain genetics to late-onset asthma via the nervous system 90%
- Injury-Prone: Peripheral nerve injuries associated with prone positioning for COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interventions to reduce opioid use for patients with chronic non-cancer pain in primary care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Hyper-connectivity between the left motor cortex and prefrontal cortex is associated with the severity of dysfunction of the descending pain modulatory system in fibromyalgia 94%
- Can a specific biobehavioral based therapeutic education program lead to changes in pain perception and brain plasticity biomarkers in chronic pain patients? A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.