Back

Multi-Task Batteries for Precision Functional Mapping

Arafat, B.; Nettekoven, C.; Xiang, J. D.; Diedrichsen, J.

2026-03-20 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.20.713227 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Functional brain mapping is an important tool to understand the organization of the human brain, both at the group level, but also to an increasing degree at the level of the individual. There are currently two main approaches to do so. Resting-state fMRI relies on inter-regional correlations of random fluctuations of the signal. In contrast, task-based localizers typically use a single-contrast between a task of interest and a matched control task to identify the location of a functional region in an individual brain. In this paper, we propose and evaluate a third approach: the use of multi-task batteries for both localization of a single functional region and parcellation of multiple functional regions. We show that multi-task localizers produce more consistent estimation of a single functional region across subjects than the single-contrast approach using the same amount of fMRI data. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the multi-task approach is sensitive to true inter-individual differences in region size, and does not suffer the same influence of signal-to-noise ratio that biases the single-contrast localizer. We then address the question of how to select tasks for the battery, and present a data-driven strategy that optimizes the characterization of a brain structure of interest. We show that such batteries outperform randomly selected batteries both for building individual parcellations as well as individual connectivity models. Finally, we demonstrate that an interspersed design - where all tasks are presented in each imaging run - yields more reliable results than splitting the tasks across different runs. We present an open source toolbox for the implementation of multi-task batteries, along with a library containing group-averaged activity patterns that can be used to optimize battery selection for different brain structures of interest.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.9%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
4
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.6%
5
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
11
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
15
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
17
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
19
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
24
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%