Back

Investigating neural speech processing with functional near infrared spectroscopy: considerations for temporal response functions

Wilroth, J.; Sotero Silva, N.; Tafakkor, A.; de Avo Mesquita, B.; Ip, E. Y. J.; Lau, B. K.; Hannah, J.; Di Liberto, G. M.

2026-03-23 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.20.713212 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is increasingly used in hearing and communication research, with advantages such as robustness to movement artifacts, improved spatial resolution, and flexibility of contexts in which it can be applied. At the same time, the field is progressively moving towards more continuous, naturalistic listening paradigms resulting in the widespread adoption of speech tracking analyses such as temporal response functions (TRFs) in electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) studies. However, it remains unclear whether these analyses can be applied to slower haemodynamic signals measured by fNIRS. In the present study, we investigated whether a TRF framework can similarly be applied to fNIRS data recorded during continuous speech perception. Eight participants listened to speech simultaneously while fNIRS signals were acquired in a hyperscanning setup. Speech features were regressed onto the haemodynamic responses to test the feasibility and interpretability of fNIRS-based TRFs. Prediction correlations between observed and modelled fNIRS signals across speech features were higher than those typically reported for EEG- and comparable to those reported for MEG-TRF studies. Moreover, these correlations did not overlap with a null distribution generated from triallJmismatched fNIRS data, confirming statistical significance and were slightly greater than those obtained from a conventional GLM approach. Our findings support that TRF estimation method can yield meaningful and statistically significant responses from fNIRS data. HighlightsO_LITRF modelling can be meaningfully applied to fNIRS data acquired during speech listening tasks. C_LIO_LIPrediction correlations between actual and modelled fNIRS signals were above chance level, with values comparable to previous EEG/MEG studies. C_LIO_LITRFs explained more fNIRS variance than a conventional GLM approach. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
18.4%
2
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.3%
4
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
5
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
8
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
9
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
11
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
12
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
17
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
19
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
22
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%