Back

Quantification of anatomical changes in young grapevine wood over time and in response to Neofusicoccum parvum with image processing

Perrin, C.; Courbot, J.-B.; Leva, Y.; Pierron, R.

2026-03-23 plant biology
10.64898/2026.03.20.713180 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Grapevine Trunk diseases (GTDs) represent a major threat for the wine industry. Despite several break-through, their etiology remains unclear and no curative treatment is currently available. Wood anatomy and water transport contribute to the symptoms of young plant decline. This study investigates wood anatomical alterations in two Alsatian grapevine cultivars presenting different susceptibility to GTDs, focusing on wood structure over six months of vegetative growth and in response to infection. Using a validated FasGa staining protocol, wood sections from transverse, tangential, and radial directions were stained to differentiate lignified and cellulosic tissues. Microscopic analysis was performed at x4, x10, and x40 magnifications, yielding a dataset of 4771 images. To support this high-throughput quantitative analysis of microscopy images, a computational model was developed, enabling reliable and efficient assessment of anatomical traits. Pre-established woody tissues presented higher xylem vessels diameter in Gewurztraminer than Riesling, with a dorsoventral arrangement whereas the number of vessels remained the same all over the cross section. No significant anatomical changes were observed in established woody tissues, whereas newly formed xylem anatomy showed a possible rearrangement during infection, especially in Gewurztraminer cultivar. Furthermore, colorimetric analysis quantified the lignification of woody tissues in response to wounding damage compared to un-treated plants. While definitive conclusions remain limited due to the experimental timeframe and sample variability, the findings highlight the need for longer-term studies and broader cultivar evaluation. Code and microscopy images have been made publicly available, providing a scalable digital tool for future research in plant vascular systems.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
21.8%
2
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.8%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.1%
5
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
8
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
10
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
11
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
12
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
14
Plant Pathology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
15
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
16
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
17
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
18
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
21
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%
23
Tree Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%