Back

Structurally Restricted Message-Passing within Shallow Architectures for Explainable Network-Level Brain Decoding on Small Cohorts

Marques dos Santos, J. D.; Ramos, M. B.; Reis, L. P.; Marques dos Santos, J. P.; Direito, B.

2026-03-23 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.20.713136 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has gained increasing attention due to its ability to model complex, high-dimensional brain data and capture nonlinear patterns of neural activity. However, deep learning architectures, such as Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), typically require large sample sizes to achieve stable convergence, limiting their applicability in neuroimaging contexts where data are often scarce. This challenge highlights the need for compact, data-efficient models that maintain predictive performance and interpretability. Shallow neural networks (SNNs) have demonstrated robustness in low-sample settings but commonly rely on region-level features that treat brain areas independently, overlooking the brains intrinsically network-based organization. To address this limitation, we propose a structurally constrained message-passing framework that integrates diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-derived structural connectivity with region-level fMRI signals within a shallow architecture. This approach enables network-level modeling while preserving the stability and data efficiency of SNNs. The method is evaluated on 30 subjects performing a Theory of Mind (ToM) task from the Human Connectome Project Young Adult dataset. A baseline SNN achieved global accuracies of 88.2% (fully connected), 80.0% (pruned), and 84.7% (retrained), while the proposed model achieved 87.1%, 77.6%, and 84.7%, respectively. Although structural constraints led to a more pronounced performance decrease after pruning, retraining restored accuracy to baseline levels, demonstrating that biological constraints can be incorporated without compromising predictive validity. Model interpretability was assessed using SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations). While the baseline model primarily identified isolated regions as key contributors, the proposed framework revealed distributed, structurally coherent networks as the main drivers of classification. These networks showed correspondence with established ToM regions, including the temporo-parietal junction, superior temporal sulcus, and inferior frontal gyrus. Importantly, the findings suggest that groups of moderately informative regions can collectively form highly relevant subnetworks. Overall, the proposed framework achieves competitive performance in a limited dataset while incorporating graph-inspired message passing into a shallow architecture. Its explainability provides insight into how structurally constrained networks support stimulus-driven responses in ToM and demonstrates potential for investigating network dysfunction in disorders such as Alzheimers disease, ADHD, autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, mild cognitive impairment, and schizophrenia.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.8%
2
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
3
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
12.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
5
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
6
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.5%
15
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
16
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
17
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%
22
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%