Standalone nanopore sequencing for foodborne pathogen surveillance: a large-scale evaluation and quality control framework
Biggel, M.; Cernela, N.; Horlbog, J.; DeMott, M. S.; Dedon, P. C.; Hall, M. B.; Chen, J.; Smith, P.; Carleton, H. A.; Stephan, R.; Urban, L.
Show abstract
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is central to foodborne pathogen surveillance and cross-border outbreak detection. Long-read sequencing using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) promises rapid, complete, and cost-effective genome assemblies in a single workflow. However, the adoption of standalone ONT sequencing of native DNA has been slowed by concerns that DNA modifications can compromise per-base sequencing accuracy and downstream genotyping. We evaluated ONT-only sequencing performance across 294 genetically diverse isolates representing ten major foodborne pathogens. At 50x coverage, 97.3% (286/294) of the ONT assemblies produced identical or near-identical cgMLST profiles ([≤]3 allelic differences) as Illumina-polished hybrid assemblies. Elevated error rates were observed in four Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky and four Listeria monocytogenes isolates and were associated with the presence of specific DNA phosphorothioation or methylation systems. To enable rapid identification of unreliable assemblies, we developed alpaqa, a lightweight computational tool that detects systematic nanopore assembly errors without requiring supplemental short-read data or reference genomes. By flagging assemblies affected by systematic errors, alpaqa provides a quality safeguard for ONT-only workflows. Masking low-quality bases in assemblies flagged by alpaqa improved cgMLST accuracy, although this reduced the number of callable loci and therefore genotyping resolution. Our findings demonstrate that standalone ONT sequencing of native DNA is sufficiently accurate for routine foodborne pathogen surveillance with current chemistry, software, and appropriate quality control, supporting its use in harmonised genomic surveillance frameworks.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fast and Accurate in silico Antigen Typing with Kaptive 3 97%
- Evaluation of the accuracy of bacterial genome reconstruction with Oxford Nanopore R10.4.1 long-read-only sequencing 97%
- Comparison of R9.4.1/Kit10 and R10/Kit12 Oxford Nanopore flowcells and chemistries in bacterial genome reconstruction 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accurate and Reproducible Whole-Genome Genotyping for Bacterial Genomic Surveillance with Nanopore Sequencing Data 97%
- Hash-based core genome multi-locus sequencing typing for Clostridium difficile 96%
- The clinical utility of two high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing workflows for taxonomic assignment of unidentifiable bacterial pathogens in MALDI-TOF MS 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- PathoGFAIR: a collection of FAIR and adaptable (meta)genomics workflows for (foodborne) pathogens detection and tracking 96%
- IDseq - An Open Source Cloud-based Pipeline and Analysis Service for Metagenomic Pathogen Detection and Monitoring 96%
- A high-throughput multiplexing and selection strategy to complete bacterial genomes 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comprehensive update to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv reference genome 94%
- Integration of taxonomic signals from MAGs and contigs improves read annotation and taxonomic profiling of metagenomes 94%
- Multi-country and intersectoral assessment of cluster congruence between different bioinformatics pipelines for genomics surveillance of foodborne bacterial pathogens 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.