Nicotine and tobacco product use among US middle and high school students, 2024-25
Sun, H.; Jiang, Y.; Tattan-Birch, H. O.; Fan, S.; Cox, S.; Jackson, S. E.
Show abstract
Abstract Importance: The overall prevalence of youth nicotine and tobacco product use has declined over recent years, but the product landscape continues to evolve rapidly, particularly with new disposable e-cigarettes and oral nicotine pouches. Objective: To examine changes between 2024 and 2025 in the prevalence of nicotine and tobacco product use among US middle and high school students and describe shifts in product characteristics among current e-cigarette and nicotine pouch users. Design, Setting, and Participants: Repeated cross-sectional study using nationally representative data from the 2024 and 2025 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS), a school-based survey of US students in grades 6-12 (approximately ages 11-18). The analytic sample included 29,678 students in 2024 and 23,557 students in 2025. Exposures: Survey year (2025 vs 2024). Main Outcomes and Measures: Past 30-day use of nicotine/tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, nicotine pouches, cigarettes, and other combustible and non-combustible products. Among current e-cigarette and nicotine pouch users, frequency of use, device type, brands, and flavors were assessed. Results: In 2025, 7.2% (95% CI, 6.4-8.2%) of US middle and high school students reported past 30-day use of any nicotine/tobacco product, compared with 8.1% (7.4-8.9%) in 2024. E-cigarettes remained the most commonly used product (5.2%, 4.5-5.9%); 1.7% (1.4-2.1%) used nicotine pouches, 1.7% (1.4-1.9%) smoked cigarettes, and 2.7% (2.4-3.1%) smoked any combustible tobacco product. Among current e-cigarette users, 40.7% (36.7-44.9%) reported frequent use and 27.0% (24.0-30.2%) reported daily use in 2025. Disposable e-cigarette use increased from 55.8% (52.6-59.0%) in 2024 to 66.7% (62.5-70.7%) in 2025, while pod/cartridge device use declined. Flavored product use was reported by 90.0% of e-cigarette users and 88.0% of nicotine pouch users. The most commonly reported brands were Geek Bar among e-cigarette users (61.1%) and ZYN among nicotine pouch users (69.4%). Conclusions and Relevance: Overall youth nicotine and tobacco use remains relatively low, but the product landscape is evolving rapidly, with increasing disposable device use and shifting brand preferences. These findings highlight the importance of ongoing, product-specific surveillance to inform public health strategies and regulatory policies.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations between e-cigarette use and e-cigarette flavors with cigarette smoking quit attempts and quit success: Evidence from a US large, nationally representative 2018-2019 survey 97%
- Impact of a regional educational advertising campaign on harm perceptions of e-cigarettes, prevalence of e-cigarette use, and quit attempts among smokers 95%
- E-cigarettes With Varenicline Versus Varenicline for Smoking Cessation: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of a Text Message Intervention Promoting Seat Belt Use Among Targeted Young Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial 92%
- Disparities in COVID-19 Reported Incidence, Knowledge, and Behavior 89%
- Violence, firearms, and the coronavirus pandemic: Findings from the 2020 California Safety and Wellbeing Survey 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in vaping trends since the announcement of an impending ban on disposable vapes: a population study in Great Britain 94%
- Transitions from smoking to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use, or stopping nicotine use in ALSPAC and their association with modifiable and sociodemographic factors 94%
- The changing face of nicotine use in England: age-specific annual trends, 2014-2024 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.