Back

BAF complexes maintain accessibility at stimulus-responsive chromatin and are required for transcriptional stimulus responses

Gulka, A. O. D.; Kang, K. A.; Zhou, Z.; Gorkin, D. U.

2026-03-21 genomics
10.64898/2026.03.19.712964 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGene expression changes in response to developmental and environmental cues rely on cis-regulatory sequence elements (cREs). BRG1/BRM-Associated Factors (BAF) chromatin remodeling complexes maintain chromatin accessibility at many cREs, enabling binding by transcription factors (TFs). However, cREs exhibit a broad range of sensitivity to loss of BAF function, and the basis of this variability remains unknown. ResultsTo identify the characteristics of BAF-dependent cREs, we mapped chromatin accessibility changes following acute pharmacologic BAF inhibition in GM12878 lymphoblastoid cells. We integrated these results with over 100 TF and histone modification ChIP-seq datasets and used machine learning to identify features that predict chromatin accessibility changes. We found that Activator Protein 1 (AP-1) factors and lymphoid lineage-defining TFs including RUNX3 and PU.1 predicted BAF-dependence. Strikingly, we found that cREs bearing the chromatin signature of "primed" enhancers - enriched for H3K4me1 but lacking H3K27ac - were significantly more sensitive to BAF inhibition than typical active enhancers. As primed enhancers are known to facilitate transcriptional responses to stimuli, we tested the requirement of BAF activity in these responses. Acute BAF inhibition was sufficient to prevent both chromatin and transcriptional responses to interferon gamma and dexamethasone. cREs which normally gained accessibility in response to stimulation failed to do so with BAF inhibition, and these cREs were linked to genes with suppressed transcriptional induction. ConclusionsCollectively, our results demonstrate a requirement for continuous BAF activity to enable stimulus response and suggest that defective signal responsiveness may be a pathogenic mechanism in disease states caused by loss-of-function mutations in BAF subunits.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.4%
4
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
5
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
6
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
7
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
8
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
14
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
20
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
22
Molecular and Cellular Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
25
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
27
Chromosoma
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
28
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%