Back

What works, for whom, and under what circumstances for recipients of training in opportunistic behaviour change conversations: a mixed methods realist evaluation protocol

Nichol, B.; Rodrigues, A. M.; Anderson-Weaver, R.; Dalkin, S.; Hunter, R.; Brown, H.; Morganer, C.; Stuart, B.; Albury, C.; Haighton, C.

2026-03-23 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.19.26348867 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Making Every Contact Count (MECC) is a person-centred initiative that enables service providers across settings to support behaviour change through conversations about health and wellbeing. MECC has been widely implemented across the UK and internationally, although training approaches vary considerably and do not consistently translate into MECC delivery. Evidence suggests that Healthy Conversation Skills (HCS) training, which supports service users to identify their own solutions, may be an acceptable and effective means of delivering MECC across settings. This realist evaluation aims to understand which elements of HCS training work, for whom, under what circumstances, in what respects, to what extent, and why, to inform the adaptation of HCS across settings to ensure that all recipients are equipped to deliver MECC. MethodsThis mixed-methods realist evaluation will comprise pre- and post-training surveys (at baseline, immediately post-training, and approximately eight weeks post-training) and realist interviews. Two participant groups were selected for comparison: service providers working or volunteering in the voluntary, community, and social enterprise (VCSE) sector, and undergraduate pharmacy students. Initial programme theories were developed through abductive reasoning, literature scoping, and stakeholder engagement. Survey data will assess outcomes of HCS training, while realist interviews will explore how these outcomes are generated by underlying mechanisms within specific contexts. DiscussionA refined programme theory will be produced, explaining how and why HCS training leads to MECC delivery across different settings. Findings will inform how HCS training can be adapted for distinct audiences, identify the core components of MECC training that must be preserved, and guide future evaluations by examining whether HCS training translates into sustained MECC delivery. The findings of this study will inform resource allocation for preventative health interventions outside of healthcare settings and thus have the potential to shape public health policy, empower non-specialist providers, and strengthen strategies for disease prevention.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.7%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.4%
4
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
7
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%