Back

Cholesterol management gaps before a recurrent coronary event: insights from the Get With The Guidelines - Coronary Artery Disease registry

Colantonio, L. D.; Wang, Z.; Sigal, S. L.; Levitan, E. B.; Bittner, V. A.

2026-03-23 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.03.19.26348857 medRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSGuidelines recommend that patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) lower their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) using maximally tolerated statin therapy to prevent recurrent events. MethodsWe analyzed the prevalence of statin nonuse and an LDL-C [≥]70 mg/dL in patients [≥]18 years of age in the Get With The Guidelines-CAD registry with known CAD who were hospitalized for a new myocardial infarction or unstable angina in 2023-2024. Data collection on statin use and LDL-C at arrival is optional in the registry. ResultsAmong 34,003 patients included (mean age 68 years; 71% male; 73% white), 31.6% did not use a statin before admission. The prevalence of statin nonuse was higher in women than in men (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 1.08; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.04, 1.14). LDL-C was not documented in 30.7% of patients. Among patients not using and using a statin, 74.6% and 49.8%, respectively, had an LDL-C [≥]70 mg/dL. Women were more likely than men to have an LDL-C [≥]70 mg/dL, whether using or not using a statin (aPR 1.18 [95%CI 1.13, 1.24] and 1.08 [95%CI 1.04, 1.12], respectively). Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to have an LDL-C [≥]70 mg/dL compared to their white counterparts (aPR 1.30 [95%CI 1.24, 1.37] and 1.11 [95%CI 1.03, 1.19], respectively) among those using a statin. There were no statistically significant differences in LDL-C by race/ethnicity among those not using a statin. ConclusionTargeted quality improvement initiatives are needed to address ambulatory cholesterol treatment gaps in patients with known CAD. Clinical PerspectiveO_ST_ABSWhat Is New?C_ST_ABSO_LIIn a contemporary national registry of patients with known coronary artery disease hospitalized for recurrent acute coronary syndromes, about one-third were not using statin therapy prior to admission. C_LIO_LIApproximately three-quarters of statin nonusers and one-half of statin users had an LDL-C level [≥]70 mg/dL at admission, indicating substantial residual risk despite current guideline recommendations. C_LIO_LIWomen and Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to have inadequately controlled LDL-C, particularly among those already receiving statin therapy. C_LI What Are the Clinical Implications?O_LIPreventable ambulatory cholesterol treatment gaps frequently occur before recurrent coronary events, underscoring the need for more guideline-recommended outpatient lipid management. C_LIO_LIRoutine LDL-C monitoring and timely intensification of lipid-lowering therapy, including high-intensity statins and add-on therapies when indicated, should be prioritized after coronary events. C_LIO_LITargeted quality improvement strategies in the ambulatory setting are needed to address persistent cholesterol treatment gaps in secondary prevention care, including sex- and race/ethnicity-related disparities. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.2%
2
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
3
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
5
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
8
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
10
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
14
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
18
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
25
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%
27
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
29
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%