Reductions to health-related quality of life associated with cigarette use, e-cigarette use, and depression among US adults
Cheng, C.; Skolnick, S.; Tam, J.
Show abstract
IntroductionAlthough prior studies suggest e-cigarette use is associated with worse mental health, it remains unclear whether these associations persist independent of diagnosed depression and how tobacco use and depression jointly affect health-related quality of life. Although the long-term health risks of vaping are still unknown, self-reported health is a reliable measure of quality of life. This study provides the first health utility estimates of the independent and combined effects of cigarette use, e-cigarette use, and depression on health-related quality of life. MethodsWe analyzed 2022-2023 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data on health-related quality of life as measured by self-reported physically or mentally unhealthy days in the past 30 days. The average number of unhealthy days was estimated by age, gender, smoking status (current versus non-smoking), depression status (received a prior diagnosis), and current e-cigarette use status (every day or some day use). We converted the number of overall healthy days into EQ-5D utility scores by age-specific percentile matching of BRFSS and MEPS distributions, a method developed by Jia and Lubetkin. ResultsCigarette use, e-cigarette use, and depression were each associated with worse health-related quality of life. Mentally unhealthy days increased with the accumulation of these conditions. Associations with physically unhealthy days followed a similar pattern, particularly among younger adults, although the magnitude of association was smaller. E-cigarette use alone was associated with 2.0-4.2 (95% CI: 2.0-4.6) additional mentally unhealthy days per month across all age groups. Notably, e-cigarette use was independently associated with poorer mental health among adults aged 18-64 with or without diagnosed depression. After accounting for smoking and depression status, e-cigarette use was associated with disutility scores of 0.011 in men and 0.015 in women among young adults, with the largest losses observed when multiple conditions co-occurred. ConclusionE-cigarette use is associated with poorer health-related quality of life, particularly among younger adults, and these effects are amplified when combined with cigarette use and depression. Quantifying these joint impacts as health utility losses highlights the importance of addressing e-cigarette use within integrated tobacco control and mental health policies, especially for young populations.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of a Text Message Intervention Promoting Seat Belt Use Among Targeted Young Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial 92%
- Association between social media use and self-reported symptoms of depression in US adults 91%
- Unhealthy lifestyle mediates the adverse effect of childhood traumas on acceleration of aging: analysis of 110,596 UK Biobank participants 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the added value of biomarkers compared with self-reported smoking in predicting future e-cigarette use: Evidence from a longitudinal UK cohort study 95%
- E-cigarette use and Respiratory Symptoms in Residents of the United States: A BRFSS Report 94%
- The effects of reduced nicotine content cigarettes in smokers with mood or anxiety disorders: a double-blind randomized trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Youth susceptibility to tobacco use: Is it general or specific? 96%
- Characterization of Trajectories of Physical Activity and Cigarette Smoking from Early Adolescence to Adulthood 94%
- Improving on estimates of the relative harm to health from using modern ENDS (vaping) compared to tobacco smoking 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.