Back

The Effects of AI-Guided Exercise and a Smart Ring on Arterial Stiffness (GONDOR-AS): protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Pentikäinen, H.; Strömmer, S.; Caraker, D.; Kosonen, J.; Rantanen, A.; Hiltunen, S.; Komulainen, P.; Similä, H.; de Zambotti, M.; Savonen, K. P.; Ohukainen, P.

2026-03-22 sports medicine
10.64898/2026.03.19.26348812 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention is limited by the major challenge of low long-term adherence to effective lifestyle regimens. Arterial stiffness (measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, cfPWV) and maximal cardiorespiratory fitness (measured by VO2max), are modifiable risk factors for CVD but require sustained lifestyle change. Wearable technology provides continuous measurement and offers a scalable platform to deliver health interventions. A combination of continuous monitoring with a wearable device and an artificial intelligence (AI) -based coach personalized for individual data and preferences could be a powerful, low-barrier tool for achieving sustainable cardiovascular health benefits by directly addressing the adherence challenge. ObjectiveWe will study the comparative effectiveness of a wearable and an interactive app-based AI coaching intervention promoting moderate exercise on improving gold-standard cfPWV and VO2max. This will be compared to a supervised high-intensity interval training (HIIT) group (benchmark with known benefits for VO2max) and a control group using only Oura Ring (passive monitoring). We will also conduct a detailed Process Evaluation (structured interviews) to study the feasibility and experience of interacting with the AI coach. MethodsThis randomized controlled trial recruited 165 eligible sedentary participants aged 30-65 years. Co-primary outcomes cfPWV and VO2max were measured at baseline and will be repeated after 12 weeks. Participants were equally randomized into three groups: an AI-based coaching group (steady-state exercise), a HIIT group (supervised exercise) and a control group (usual low activity). The AI-based coaching group receives personalized guidance using large language model (LLM) technology. All participants wear Oura Ring and are blinded to cardiovascular health metrics provided by the ring. ResultsThe recruitment for the study began in October 2024 and will end when 165 men and women have been recruited. Data collection for the study is scheduled to conclude early 2026. Data collection is ongoing. ConclusionsThis study will evaluate if a highly scalable, AI-based coaching intervention can achieve comparable gains in CV structural health (cfPWV) and functional capacity VO2max relative to a resource-intensive supervised HIIT benchmark. The findings will provide essential evidence on the use of digital health tools to promote sustainable exercise adherence. ClinicalTrials.gov registration identifierNCT06644014 (Registered: 2024-10-15)

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
17.3%
2
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.3%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
4
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Nephrology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
12
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
16
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
23
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
26
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%