Blood-based RNA-Seq of 5412 individuals with rare disease identifies new candidate diagnoses in the National Genomic Research Library
Lord, J.; Pagnamenta, A. T.; Vestito, L.; Walker, S.; Jaramillo Oquendo, C.; McGuigan, A. E.; Ho, A.; Odhams, C.; Jacobsen, J. O.; Mehta, S.; Reid, E.; O'Driscoll, M.; Watson, C. M.; Crinnion, L. A.; Robinson, R. L.; Musgrave, H.; Martin, R. J.; James, T. P.; Ross, M. T.; Kyritsi, M.; Carnielli, L.; Walker, N.; Vucenovic, D.; Maheswari, U.; Baralle, F. E.; Taylor, J. C.; Ellingford, J. M.; Kasperaviciute, D.; Hoa, L.; Elgar, G.; Brown, M. A.; Smedley, D.; Baralle, D.
Show abstract
RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is increasingly used alongside exome and genome sequencing to identify causal variants underlying rare Mendelian disorders. We present short-read RNA-Seq data from 5,412 individuals with a diverse range of rare disorders recruited to Genomics Englands 100,000 Genomes Project. We show that the proportion of genes from gene panels applied to different disorders which are well captured (transcripts per million (TPM) [≥] 5) from blood RNA varies widely, highlighting differences in applicability across disorder types. Using OUTRIDER and FRASER2 to identify gene expression and splicing outliers respectively, we identify at least one outlier event in a disorder relevant gene in 20% of the cohort. To prioritise likely diagnostic candidates, we apply multiple strategies including focussing on outlier events in known haploinsufficient genes (n=78), integrating outliers with structural variant calls (n=19), and using strategies integrating phenotypic presentation (Exomiser, n=39). We present a series of candidate diagnoses involving diverse variant types and disease mechanisms, demonstrating the broad utility of RNA-Seq in identifying and prioritising diagnostic candidates in individuals with a variety of different rare conditions and no known genetic diagnosis. Our findings demonstrate that blood-based RNA-Seq can deliver clinically relevant findings across a broad range of rare disorders.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Advancing long-read nanopore genome assembly and accurate variant calling for rare disease detection 96%
- Transcriptome-wide outlier approach identifies individuals with minor spliceopathies 96%
- MRSD: a novel quantitative approach for assessing suitability of RNA-seq in the clinical investigation of mis-splicing in Mendelian disease 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A gene pathogenicity tool 'GenePy' identifies missed biallelic diagnoses in the 100,000 Genomes Project 96%
- Assessment of the variant prioritisation strategy for genomic newborn screening in the Generation Study 96%
- The Importance of Automation in Genetic Diagnosis: Lessons from Analyzing an Inherited Retinal Degeneration Cohort with the Mendelian Analysis Toolkit (MATK) 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clustering of predicted loss-of-function variants in genes linked with monogenic disease can explain incomplete penetrance 96%
- Evaluating Genome Sequencing Strategies: Trio, Singleton, and Standard Testing in Rare Disease Diagnosis 96%
- A systematic analysis of splicing variants identifies new diagnoses in the 100,000 Genomes Project. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive reanalysis for CNVs in ES data from unsolved rare disease cases results in new diagnoses 96%
- Discordance between a deep learning model and clinical-grade variant pathogenicity classification in a rare disease cohort 94%
- Biallelic truncation variants in ATP9A are associated with a novel autosomal recessive neurodevelopmental disorder 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Phasing of de novo mutations using a scaled-up multiple amplicon long-read sequencing approach 95%
- Matching whole genomes to rare genetic disorders: Identification of potential causative variants using phenotype-weighted knowledge in the CAGI SickKids5 clinical genomes challenge 95%
- Whole genome sequencing of ‘mutation-negative’ individuals with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.