Back

A clinic-updated digital twin for Parkinson's disease progression: governed Bayesian forecasting with uncertainty-gated reporting

Hemedan, A. A.

2026-03-22 health informatics
10.64898/2026.03.19.26348807 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundClinical digital twins hold considerable promise for forecasting disease progression, yet the question of when a models outputs should be withheld remains largely unaddressed. A predictive model qualifies as a governed reporting system only when it specifies the operational boundaries under which its outputs are reliable and enforces criteria for suppressing results that fall outside those bounds. MethodsWe present a governed Bayesian digital twin for multi-domain Parkinsons disease (PD) progression, tracking motor function (MDS-UPDRS Part III), cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA), and autonomic function (SCOPA-AUT). A monotone latent state-space model captures disease progression under four architectural constraints: non-decreasing latent severity, visit-triggered updating, full posterior uncertainty propagation, and non-causal scope. A six-rule confidence gate evaluates each forecast before release; when evidence is insufficient, the gate suppresses the output and returns a structured reason code. We evaluated the framework on the Parkinsons Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI), a multicentre longitudinal observational study (N=4,628 participants; 28,185 visits), using five-fold cross-validation with independent model refits, equity analysis, and coupling-topology sensitivity assessment. The framework is available at https://gitlab.com/ahmed.hemedan/symphony-dt, with a research prototype at https://symphony-dt.com/. ResultsPredictive interval coverage at the 95% level ranged from 94% to 96% across all three endpoints, compared with 64-69% for linear mixed-effects baselines. The confidence gate released governed forecasts at 32.7% of visits under strict three-domain requirements, increasing to 48.1% under a validated partial-observation extension. Suppression was predominantly driven by incomplete clinical assessment (51.5%) rather than model uncertainty (0.2%), and operated equitably across sexes (Cramers V=0.049). Five of six cross-domain coupling parameters were identified from the data (sign probability [≥] 0.99; contraction ratios 0.19-0.35), with all cross-domain forecast correlations matching the directions predicted by the coupling topology. The frameworks own diagnostics localised two observation-model limitations, Prodromal motor heteroscedasticity and medication-burden sensitivity, to a single model layer and specified their resolution. ConclusionsGoverned silence, defined as the rule-based suppression of predictions when reliability conditions are not met, can be embedded in clinical prediction architecture, quantified as a pipeline output, and audited for equity. This work demonstrates the technical executability of governed digital twin architecture at cohort scale and provides a foundation for prospective deployment under routine clinical conditions.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.8%
2
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.9%
4
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
5
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.2%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
8
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
9
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
12
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
13
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
14
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
15
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
23
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
25
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%