Back

A clinic-updated digital twin for Parkinson's disease progression: governed Bayesian forecasting with uncertainty-gated reporting

Hemedan, A. A.

2026-03-22 health informatics
10.64898/2026.03.19.26348807 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundClinical digital twins hold considerable promise for forecasting disease progression, yet the question of when a models outputs should be withheld remains largely unaddressed. A predictive model qualifies as a governed reporting system only when it specifies the operational boundaries under which its outputs are reliable and enforces criteria for suppressing results that fall outside those bounds. MethodsWe present a governed Bayesian digital twin for multi-domain Parkinsons disease (PD) progression, tracking motor function (MDS-UPDRS Part III), cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA), and autonomic function (SCOPA-AUT). A monotone latent state-space model captures disease progression under four architectural constraints: non-decreasing latent severity, visit-triggered updating, full posterior uncertainty propagation, and non-causal scope. A six-rule confidence gate evaluates each forecast before release; when evidence is insufficient, the gate suppresses the output and returns a structured reason code. We evaluated the framework on the Parkinsons Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI), a multicentre longitudinal observational study (N=4,628 participants; 28,185 visits), using five-fold cross-validation with independent model refits, equity analysis, and coupling-topology sensitivity assessment. The framework is available at https://gitlab.com/ahmed.hemedan/symphony-dt, with a research prototype at https://symphony-dt.com/. ResultsPredictive interval coverage at the 95% level ranged from 94% to 96% across all three endpoints, compared with 64-69% for linear mixed-effects baselines. The confidence gate released governed forecasts at 32.7% of visits under strict three-domain requirements, increasing to 48.1% under a validated partial-observation extension. Suppression was predominantly driven by incomplete clinical assessment (51.5%) rather than model uncertainty (0.2%), and operated equitably across sexes (Cramers V=0.049). Five of six cross-domain coupling parameters were identified from the data (sign probability [≥] 0.99; contraction ratios 0.19-0.35), with all cross-domain forecast correlations matching the directions predicted by the coupling topology. The frameworks own diagnostics localised two observation-model limitations, Prodromal motor heteroscedasticity and medication-burden sensitivity, to a single model layer and specified their resolution. ConclusionsGoverned silence, defined as the rule-based suppression of predictions when reliability conditions are not met, can be embedded in clinical prediction architecture, quantified as a pipeline output, and audited for equity. This work demonstrates the technical executability of governed digital twin architecture at cohort scale and provides a foundation for prospective deployment under routine clinical conditions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.