Harnessing exhaled breath for lung cancer early detection, results from the ExPeL study
Patel, D.; D'Cruz, L.; Ahmed, W.; Chauhan, A.; Bakerly, N.; Grundy, S.; Trivedi, D. K.; Knight, S.
Show abstract
Background Scalable, non invasive tools are critically needed to improve early lung cancer detection and optimize primary care referral pathways. We evaluated Inflammacheck, a point-of-care device utilizing exhaled breath condensate (EBC) H2O2 and physiological parameters with machine learning, for non-invasive lung cancer detection in a real-world screening population. Methods ExPeL study participants, from the UK Targeted Lung Health Check (TLHC) programme, included individuals with suspected lung cancer and low-risk ever-smoker controls. EBC was collected via Inflammacheck, measuring H2O2;, end-tidal CO2;, humidity, temperature, and exhalation flow rate. Multivariate analyses (PCA, LDA, Mahalanobis distance) assessed intrinsic group separation. SMOTE-balanced data trained supervised machine learning models (stacked and voting ensembles), which were then evaluated on held-out test sets. In parallel, untargeted LCMS metabolomics was performed to identify discriminatory molecular features. Results Analysing 34 participants with valid EBC data, 83% of cancer cases were early-stage (I or II), reflecting a screening population. Multivariate analysis clearly separated lung cancer and controls across PCA, LDA, and Mahalanobis mapping. The voting ensemble model achieved: Accuracy 85.7%, Sensitivity 80%, Specificity 100%, Precision (PPV) 100%, ROC AUC 0.90, MCC 0.73. Crucially, no false positives were identified. EBC variables revealed greater dispersion in cancer patients, reflecting physiological heterogeneity missed by univariate analysis. Untargeted metabolomics identified 2,132 features, with four key metabolites yielding an AUC of 0.969 for cancer discrimination. Discussion Inflammacheck effectively distinguishes early-stage lung cancer via a rapid, non-invasive breath test, findings which are highly relevant for primary care and screening triage, where non-specific symptoms and low prevalence pose challenges.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clustering-based COPD Subtypes Have Distinct Longitudinal Outcomes and Multi-omics Biomarkers 92%
- Two-way remote monitoring allows effective and realistic provision of home-NIV to COPD patients with persistent hypercapnia 90%
- Effect of smoking on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment outcomes and potential mechanistic pathways: A multicountry cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The protective effect of club cell secretory protein (CC-16) on COPD risk and progression: a Mendelian randomisation study 91%
- Radiomics analysis to predict pulmonary nodule malignancy using machine learning approaches 91%
- Aerosol emission from the respiratory tract: an analysis of relative risks from oxygen delivery systems 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single cell sequencing reveals cellular landscape alterations in the airway mucosa of patients with pulmonary long COVID 93%
- Standard pleural interventions are not high-risk aerosol generating procedures 90%
- Increased expression of ACE2, the SARS-CoV-2 entry receptor, in alveolar and bronchial epithelium of smokers and COPD subjects 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The UIP honeycomb airway cells are the site of mucin biogenesis with deranged cilia 92%
- Proteomic associations with forced expiratory volume – a Mendelian randomisation study 91%
- Metagenomic identification of severe pneumonia pathogens with rapid Nanopore sequencing in mechanically-ventilated patients. 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.