Public attitudes toward sharing health data for artificial intelligence: Differences by data type and sector in the Health in Central Denmark cohort
Schaarup, J. R.; Isaksen, A. A.; Hulman, A.
Show abstract
AimsWe aimed to examine public perceptions of sharing various types of health data relevant for AI development, including electronic health records, audio recordings of consultations, medical images, and genetic information, with actors from either the public or the private sectors. MethodsWe analysed data from 38,740 participants of the Health in Central Denmark survey conducted in 2024. Participants were asked whether they would share different types of health data with an AI solution in healthcare. Each participant was randomised to either of two versions of the scenario and question where the AI application was developed in the public or private sector. Descriptive results (proportions and percentages) were weighted to represent the background population of approx. 1 million people in the Central Denmark Region. The association between randomization group (data recipient) and data sharing attitude ("Yes", "No", "Dont know") was analysed using multinomial logistic regression with "Dont know" as reference category. ResultsParticipants were most willing to share medical images (46%), followed by text from patient journals (39%), genetic information (35%), and audio recordings (27%). There were 12-16% higher proportions of willingness to share with public institutions than with private institutions. A high level of uncertainty was observed for all data types (29-36%) regardless of data recipient. Odds ratios ranged from 1.37 to 1.78 for responding "Yes", and from 0.51 to 0.67 for responding "No" to sharing data with public institutions compared to private institutions. ConclusionsPublic acceptance of health data sharing for AI depends on both the perceived sensitivity of the data and the institutional context of use. Strong public governance, transparent safeguards, and clear communication about data use may be important for maintaining trust and enabling responsible development of AI in healthcare.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The challenges of replication: a worked example of methods reproducibility using routinely collected healthcare data 93%
- ChatGPT- versus human-generated answers to frequently asked questions about diabetes: a Turing test-inspired survey among employees of a Danish diabetes center 93%
- Patterns of rates of mortality in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
- Diversity and inclusion: A hidden additional benefit of Open Data 93%
- Socioeconomic and demographic patterning of family uptake of a paediatric electronic patient portal innovation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Data-driven discovery of changes in clinical code usage over time: a case-study on changes in cardiovascular disease recording in two English electronic health records databases (2001-2015) 93%
- Physician experiences of electronic health records interoperability and its practical impact on care delivery in the English NHS: A cross-sectional survey study 92%
- Replicating a COVID-19 study in a national England database to assess the generalisability of research with regional electronic health record data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 91%
- Spatio-temporal modelling of referrals to outpatient respiratory clinics in the integrated care system of the Morecambe Bay area, England 90%
- Revisiting the use and effectiveness of patient-held records in rural Malawi 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 94%
- Cracking the Code: A Scoping Review to Unite Disciplines in Tackling Legal Issues in Health Artificial Intelligence 94%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.