Back

Public attitudes toward sharing health data for artificial intelligence: Differences by data type and sector in the Health in Central Denmark cohort

Schaarup, J. R.; Isaksen, A. A.; Hulman, A.

2026-03-22 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.03.19.26348784 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimsWe aimed to examine public perceptions of sharing various types of health data relevant for AI development, including electronic health records, audio recordings of consultations, medical images, and genetic information, with actors from either the public or the private sectors. MethodsWe analysed data from 38,740 participants of the Health in Central Denmark survey conducted in 2024. Participants were asked whether they would share different types of health data with an AI solution in healthcare. Each participant was randomised to either of two versions of the scenario and question where the AI application was developed in the public or private sector. Descriptive results (proportions and percentages) were weighted to represent the background population of approx. 1 million people in the Central Denmark Region. The association between randomization group (data recipient) and data sharing attitude ("Yes", "No", "Dont know") was analysed using multinomial logistic regression with "Dont know" as reference category. ResultsParticipants were most willing to share medical images (46%), followed by text from patient journals (39%), genetic information (35%), and audio recordings (27%). There were 12-16% higher proportions of willingness to share with public institutions than with private institutions. A high level of uncertainty was observed for all data types (29-36%) regardless of data recipient. Odds ratios ranged from 1.37 to 1.78 for responding "Yes", and from 0.51 to 0.67 for responding "No" to sharing data with public institutions compared to private institutions. ConclusionsPublic acceptance of health data sharing for AI depends on both the perceived sensitivity of the data and the institutional context of use. Strong public governance, transparent safeguards, and clear communication about data use may be important for maintaining trust and enabling responsible development of AI in healthcare.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
17.5%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
6
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
11
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
20
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%