Mapping the Clinical Trial Landscape in Anorexia Nervosa: A Registry-Based Analysis of Research Activity and Translational Gaps

BackgroundAnorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe psychiatric disorder associated with profound malnutrition, multisystem medical complications, and one of the highest mortality rates among mental illnesses. Despite decades of research into its biological and neurocognitive mechanisms, effective pharmacological treatments remain limited. While systematic reviews synthesize results from published studies, clinical trial registries offer a complementary perspective by capturing ongoing research efforts, discontinued studies, and emerging therapeutic strategies that may not yet be reflected in the published literature. ObjectiveThis study aimed to characterize the landscape of clinical research in AN by systematically analyzing studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. MethodsWe conducted a structured analysis of studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov related to AN. Trial characteristics, including study design, intervention type, phase classification, geographic distribution, and recruitment status, were extracted and analyzed using an automated text-based classification pipeline. ResultsNearly 400 studies investigating AN were identified over the past 25 years. Approximately 71% were classified as interventional studies; however, a large proportion were not associated with conventional clinical trial phases, suggesting that many registered trials correspond to mechanistic or exploratory investigations rather than therapeutic development programs. The geographic distribution of studies revealed a strong predominance of North America and Western Europe. A substantial proportion of trials were terminated or discontinued, highlighting the significant challenges associated with conducting interventional studies in this population. Observational studies generally included larger sample sizes than interventional trials. ConclusionsRegistry-based analyses provide valuable insights into the evolving landscape of clinical research in AN. Despite considerable scientific activity, important gaps remain between mechanistic knowledge and the development of therapeutic interventions. Understanding these gaps may help inform future translational research strategies aimed at improving treatment options for this severe disorder.