Back

A Neural Mass Modelling Framework for Evaluating EEG Source Localisation of Seizure Activity

Siu, P. H.; Karoly, P. J.; Mansour L, S.; Soto-Breceda, A.; Kuhlmann, L.; Cook, M. J.; Grayden, D. B.

2026-03-20 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.18.712805 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG) provide non-invasive measurements of large-scale neural activity but do not directly reveal the underlying cortical sources, motivating the use of source localisation algorithms. However, objective evaluation of these methods remains challenging due to the absence of an experimentally verifiable ground truth. This study presents a simulation framework for generating biologically plausible ictal dynamics and their corresponding EEG signals to enable systematic benchmarking of source imaging approaches. Cortical seizure initiation and propagation were simulated using network-coupled neural mass (Epileptor) models, and combined with realistic forward models of the human head to produce macroscopic, electrophysiological data with known ground truth under varying conditions. Using this dataset, we evaluated established source localisation methods across idealised and realistic scenarios. Existing approaches achieved reasonable spatial accuracy under high-density, noise-free conditions; however, performance degraded substantially with reduced sensor coverage and added noise. This degradation was driven primarily by failures to recover source polarity, even when spatial localisation remained relatively accurate. These results suggest that current methods may be sufficient for identifying epileptogenic regions or tracking regional recruitment, but highlight polarity reconstruction as a key limitation for studies of seizure dynamics and network organisation. The proposed framework provides a reproducible and biologically grounded testbed for the development and evaluation of electrophysiological source localisation techniques.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
19.6%
2
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.9%
4
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
5
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.9%
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
10
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
12
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
13
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
15
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
17
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%
26
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
27
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%