Back

Multi-trait Multi-environment Genomic Prediction Strategies for Miscanthus sacchariflorus Populations

Proma, S.; Garcia-Abadillo, J.; Sagae, V. S.; Sacks, E.; Leakey, A. D. B.; Zhao, H.; Ghimire, B. K.; Lipka, A. E.; Njuguna, J. N.; Yu, C. Y.; Seong, E. S.; Yoo, J. H.; Nagano, H.; Anzoua, K. G.; Yamada, T.; Chebukin, P.; Jin, X.; Clark, L. V.; Petersen, K. K.; Peng, J.; Sabitov, A.; Dzyubenko, E.; Dzyubenko, N.; Glowacka, K.; Nascimento, M.; Campana Nascimento, A. C.; Dwiyanti, M. S.; Bagment, L.; Shaik, A.; Jarquin, D.

2026-03-23 genomics
10.64898/2026.03.18.712730 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genomic selection holds the potential to serve as a strategic tool to enhance the genetic gain of complex traits in Miscanthus breeding programs. The development of improved cultivars requires their assessment for various traits across diverse environments to ensure suitable overall performance. Hence, the multi-trait multi-environment (MTME) genomic prediction (GP) models offer an opportunity to improve selection accuracy. This study aims to evaluate the potential of five GP models: (1) three MTME models including genotype-by-trait-by-environment interaction (GxExT) and (2) two single-trait multi-environment (STME) models (with and without GxE interaction). A Miscanthus sacchariflorus population comprising 336 genotypes evaluated in three environments and scored for four traits (biomass yield YDY, total culm number TCM, average internode length AIL, and culm node number CNN) was analyzed. The predictive ability of the models was evaluated considering three cross-validation schemes resembling realistic scenarios (CV1: predicting new genotypes, CVP: predicting missing traits in a given environment, and CV2: predicting partially observed genotypes). On average, in all cross-validation schemes compared to the STME the predictive ability of the MTME models was 10% to 70% higher for TCM and AIL. On the other hand, for YDY and CNN, both STME models performed similarly or slightly better (between 5 to 64%) than the MTME models in most environments. While the MTME models were not successful for all traits when compared to their STME counterparts, MTME models improved the prediction of the performance of genotypes that were untested across environments or lacked trait information in a specific environment. Overall, our study suggests that MTME GP models can be implemented in Miscanthus breeding programs to improve the predictive ability of the complex traits, shorten breeding cycles, and accelerate selection decisions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.1%
3
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
6
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
7
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
8
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
9
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
10
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
12
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
13
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
15
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
17
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
21
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%