Back

Comparative cross-species transcriptomic analysis identifies new candidates of Pooideae nitrate response

Gregoire, M.; Pateyron, S.; Brunaud, V.; Tamby, J. P.; Benghelima, L.; Martin, M.-L.; Girin, T.

2026-03-20 plant biology
10.64898/2026.03.18.712634 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWNitrogen fertilizers are essential for crop productivity but cause environmental harm, necessitating the development of cultivars that thrive under limited nitrogen. This study investigates the transcriptomic response to nitrate in Arabidopsis thaliana (a model dicot), Brachypodium distachyon (a model Pooideae), and Hordeum vulgare (barley, a domesticated Pooideae) to identify conserved and species-specific molecular mechanisms. Using RNA-seq after 1.5 and 3 hours of nitrate treatment, we found that core nitrate-responsive biological processes - such as nitrate transport, assimilation, carbon metabolism, and hormone signaling - are largely conserved across species. However, comparative analysis at gene level based on orthology revealed specificities between the species. For instance, rRNA processing was uniquely stimulated in Arabidopsis, while cysteine biosynthesis from serine and gibberellin biosynthesis were specifically regulated in Brachypodium and barley. Orthologs of key nitrate-responsive genes (e.g., NRT, NLP, TCP20) exhibited variable regulation, reflecting potential adaptations linked to domestication or nutrient acquisition strategies. These findings highlight the importance of integrating model and crop species to uncover targets for improving nitrogen use efficiency in cereals. The study provides a pipeline integrating gene ontology and orthology analyses to compare transcriptomic responses between species.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.1%
2
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.3%
3
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.1%
4
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
5
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
8
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
10
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.1%
12
Environmental and Experimental Botany
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
13
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
14
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
15
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
17
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Plant Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Plant And Cell Physiology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Plant and Cell Physiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Plant Reproduction
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
29
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
30
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%