Back

Integrating metagenome-scale metabolic modelling and metabolomics to identify biochemical interactions in Microcystis phycospheres

Audemard, J.; Creusot, N.; Leloup, J.; Duval, C.; Halary, S.; Mary, L.; Eon, M.; Forjonel, T.; Mouffok, M.; Puppo, R.; Belmonte, E.; Gautier, V.; Got, J.; Lefebvre, M.; Markov, G. V.; Muller, C.; Marie, B.; Dieme, B.; Frioux, C.

2026-03-23 systems biology
10.64898/2026.03.18.712574 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Favoured by global changes, freshwater cyanobacterial harmful blooms generate major ecological, economical and public health challenges. Microcystis, one of the most widespread cyanobacterial genera, grows within a phycosphere where specialised interactions with its microbiome occur, and are suspected to influence bloom appearance and its potential toxicity. Using a combination of metagenomic, metabolomic and metabolic modelling, we characterised the phycospheres of twelve Microcystis strains isolated from a French pond. The distribution of metabolic reactions within Microcystis was consistent with their genospecies, whereas the metabolic landscape at the community level diverged from cyanobacterial phylogeny indicating functional decoupling between cyanobacteria and their associated microbiomes. Phycosphere-associated bacteria substantially expand the metabolic repertoire of the system, while maintaining functional redundancy within and across communities. On the other hand, metabolomic profiles were largely driven by cyanobacterial metabolic outputs. Metabolic modelling, together with the identification of toxic specialised metabolites produced by specific biosynthetic gene clusters, further highlighted differences in metabolic potential among phycospheres. Together, these findings deepen the understanding of Microcystis phycosphere functioning, demonstrate the value of multi-omics systems biology approaches, and underscore the ecological relevance of interspecies and inter-phycosphere metabolic interactions as a structuring process in bloom-associated microbiomes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
9.2%
3
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
4
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
5
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.3%
8
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
9
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
11
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
14
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
15
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
18
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
20
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
24
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Bioresource Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%