Back

A Patient-Specific CFD Study of Carotid Webs: Hemodynamic Analysis and the Role of Blood Viscosity

Zhao, X.; Khan, F.; Lewis, S.; Rodriguez, M.

2026-03-20 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.18.26348736 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Carotid webs (CaWs) are shelf-like protrusions in carotid bifurcation recognized as a potential cause of ischemic stroke. However, their impact on wall-based hemodynamic metrics (TAWSS, OSI, RRT) in distinguishing from normal bifurcations remains unclear. Methods. Carotid geometries were reconstructed from CT angiography in patients with CaWs, classified as symptomatic (with ischemic stroke) or asymptomatic (incidentally detected), and controls with normal bifurcations. Influence of three blood viscosity models (Newtonian, Carreau-Yasuda, Casson) was evaluated. Metrics were quantified using a Gaussian-weighted spatial averaging method and compared between groups. Results. CFD simulations were performed in 22 CaW cases (16 symptomatic, 6 asymptomatic) and 6 normal bifurcations. Simulations predicted recirculation corresponding to delayed contrast clearance on DSA. Viscosity models had minimal influence on flow patterns (<2% differences). CaWs showed greater inter-patient variability than normal bifurcations, but overlap remained (e.g., TAWSS 3.39 (2.72-8.96) vs 4.18 (3.09-4.56) Pa, p = 0.858). Symptomatic CaWs showed lower TAWSS and higher OSI and RRT than asymptomatic CaWs (TAWSS 3.39 vs 6.63 Pa), although did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.25). Conclusion. Symptomatic CaWs show lower shear stress and stronger oscillations than asymptomatic CaWs. However, wall-based hemodynamic metrics alone may not distinguish CaWs from normal carotid geometries.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.6%
2
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.1%
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
7
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
8
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
9
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
10
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
11
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
12
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
16
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%