Exploring the Link Between Cancer Information Complexity and Understanding Medical Statistics in Online Health Information Seeking: Insights from Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS)
CHAKRABORTY, A.; Das, S.; Phyo, M.
Show abstract
Introduction: Understanding the factors influencing perceptions of cancer-related information is crucial for improving public health communication. This study explores the association between perceived difficulty in understanding information related to cancer (Cancer info Hard to Understand) and concerns about the quality of cancer-related information (Concern about Cancer Info Quality) with the extent of difficulty in comprehending medical statistics information (Understanding Medical Statistics). Methods: Data came from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). The cross-sectional study included 1972 participants with a response rate of 67.36% for Cancer info Hard to Understand, and 65.31% for Concern about Cancer Info Quality. We investigated the effect of Understanding Medical Statistics on Cancer info Hard to Understand, and Concern about Cancer Info Quality using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models with survey weights. The multivariable logistic regression model was adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, education level, employment history, confidence in internet health resources, and social media. The chi-square test was used to measure the association between the predictors and the outcome. Results: Individuals finding medical statistics hard to understand were more likely to be concerned regarding the quality of the cancer-related information (AOR=1.74, 95% CI: [1.20, 2.52]) and also found cancer-related information difficult to comprehend (AOR=1.89, 95% CI: [1.19, 3.00]). Also, the influence of social media on health information seeking was significantly associated with Concern about Cancer Info Quality (AOR=2.24; 95% CI: [1.33, 3.76]), and Cancer info Hard to Understand (AOR=2.84; 95% CI: [1.61, 5.03]). Conclusion: This study highlights the critical role of understanding medical statistics in shaping perceptions of cancer-related information. From an epidemiological perspective, enhancing statistical literacy is essential for making informed health decisions, addressing health disparities, and designing effective, targeted cancer communication strategies.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Health indicators as a measure of individual health status: public perspectives 94%
- Has the pandemic enhanced and sustained digital health-seeking behaviour? A big data interrupted time-series analysis of Google Trends 93%
- Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Higher FIT Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 92%
- Understanding motivations of older women to continue or discontinue breast cancer screening 92%
- The Role of Testing Availability on Intentions to Isolate during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital applications to support self-management of multimorbidity: A scoping review 92%
- Development and Evaluation of MADDIE: Method to Acquire Delivery Date Information from Electronic Health Records 91%
- Performance of Advanced Large Language Models (GPT-4o, GPT-4, Gemini 1.5 Pro, Claude 3 Opus) on Japanese Medical Licensing Examination: A Comparative Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 92%
- Use of Generative AI for Health Among Urban Youth in Pakistan: A Mixed-Methods Study 92%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can Large Language Models Aid Caregivers of Pediatric Cancer Patients in Information Seeking? A Cross-Sectional Investigation 93%
- Making prognostic algorithms useful in shared decision-making: Patients and clinicians’ requirements for the Predict:Breast Cancer interface 90%
- A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients with Cancer 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.