Back

Feasibility study on a Noninvasive Assessment of ALS Patient Emotional State

Garbey, M.; Lesport, Q.; Oztosun, G.; Heidebrecht, M.; Pirouz, K.; Bayat, E.

2026-03-24 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.18.26348710 medRxiv
Show abstract

This study addresses the need for objective, real-time assessment of emotional responsiveness and coping strategies in individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) to support personalized care. We are using non-invasive speech analysis and data science methods on an expanded cohort comprising 28 ALS patient visits. We first demonstrate that commonly available artificial intelligence tools, including current-generation large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude, do not provide reliable or reproducible assessments of patient concern levels in the absence of expert clinical supervision. Further, we observe a discrepancy between subjective and objective metrics such as the forced vital capacity for breathing. We introduce a novel functional classification system that contextualizes clinician-rated emotional concern relative to the patient's functional impairment as measured by the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALS-FRS). Patient responses are categorized as: Congruent: Emotional responsiveness is proportional to functional impairment. Muted: Emotional response is lower than expected given functional impairment. Excessive: Emotional response exceeds that expected given functional impairment

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
22.9%
2
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
3
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
5
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
6
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
2.9%
9
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
12
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.8%
25
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
27
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%