Back

Cost-benefit analysis of deceased donor organ transplantation: an economic evaluation

Riley, J.; Roberts, B.; Rashid, B.; Barton, L.; Wellberry Smith, M.; Sutcliffe, R.; Billingham, E.; Pettit, S.; Jones, G.; Fisher, A. J.; Parmar, J.; Lim, S.; Ravanan, R.; Manas, D.

2026-03-19 transplantation
10.64898/2026.03.18.26348687 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Each year around 4,500 people in the UK receive an organ transplant. These surgeries can be life changing and life extending for patients but are also associated with significant costs for the health service. However, by reducing the need for other expensive interventions involved in non-transplant care for organ failure, such as dialysis, some of these costs may be recovered. Methods: We assessed the lifetime costs and benefits associated with transplantation focussing on deceased donor adult transplants for kidneys, livers, hearts, and lungs. We incorporated costs of organ retrieval, surgery, post-transplant secondary care, and medications, as well as impacts on quality and duration of life. These were compared to the cost of managing patients with end-stage organ failure for whom no transplant occurs. Results: Kidney transplants were found to be cost saving with lifetime costs approximately 220,000 GBP lower than alternative treatment. Heart transplants and liver transplants were found to be more cost-effective than thresholds used by NICE for new medicines at approximately 17,000 GBP to 18,000 GBP per quality adjusted life year gained. Lung transplants were the least cost-effective organ transplant with a cost per quality adjusted life year gained of over 50,000 GBP. Conclusions: Although transplants can be costly, not providing a transplant to a patient who needs one also brings significant costs. Kidney transplants can save the health system money by reducing the need for dialysis. Increasing the number of kidney's available for transplant could save the NHS money whilst saving and improving lives.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.1%
3
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.0%
6
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
8
BMC Nephrology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
9
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
10
American Journal of Transplantation
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Kidney International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.3%
14
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
15
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
18
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
21
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
23
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
25
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%