Back

Evaluating tuberculosis treatment outcomes and predictors in five Southern African countries: A multi-country cohort analysis

Ndhlovu, M.; Wuethrich, L.; Huwa, J.; Thawani, A.; Chiwaya, G.; Kudzala, A.; Chintedza, J.; Muula, G.; Evans, D.; Rafael, I.; Kunzekwenyika, C.; Mureithi, F.; Jinga, N. J.; Fernando, A.; Ballif, M.; Günther, G.; Fenner, L.; Banholzer, N.

2026-03-20 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.18.26348675 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Despite global progress in tuberculosis (TB) control, treatment outcomes remain suboptimal, particularly in high-burden settings and among people with HIV or drug-resistant TB. Identifying predictors of unsuccessful treatment is essential to improve TB care and policy. Methods: We evaluated TB treatment outcomes and patient characteristics associated with unsuccessful outcomes in five cohorts of the International epidemiology database to evaluate AIDS (IeDEA); Center for Infectious Disease Research, Zambia; Chiure health center, Mozambique; Martin Preuss Center, Lighthouse clinic, Malawi; Masvingo health center Zimbabwe; and Themba Lethu clinic, Hellen Joseph hospital, South Africa. We included all patients with TB aged 15 years starting TB treatment and assessed their treatment outcomes in association with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics using multivariable mixed-effects models. Unsuccessful outcomes were defined as death, loss to follow-up and treatment failure. Results: Among 1438 people with TB, median age was 39 years, 67% males, 40% with HIV, and 4% with MDR-TB; 1151 (80%) treatment outcomes were successful (606 cured and 545 completed treatment), 221 (15%) unsuccessful (89 deaths, 129 loss to follow-up and 3 treatment failures), and 66 (5%) other (49 unknown and 17 transfer-outs). Unsuccessful outcomes were more probable among people with multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and among participants without formal education. Risk of death was lower for people with bacteriologically confirmed TB (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.5, 95%-credible interval [CI] 0.25-0.80), those with a secondary or higher education (aOR 0.3, 95%-CI 0.13-0.69) and BMI 318 kg/m{superscript 2} (aOR 0.6, 95%-CI 0.36-0.99). MDR-TB was associated with an increase (aOR 2.4 95%-CI 1.17-4.97) and primary and secondary or higher education with a decrease in loss to follow-up (aOR 0.3, 95%-CI 0.14-0.89 and aOR 0.3, 95%-CI 0.11-0.67, respectively). Conclusions: TB treatment outcomes fell short of the targets set by the World Health Organization of <10% unsuccessful outcomes, indicating a critical need for enhanced management strategies. Tackling loss to follow-up is crucial, especially among MDR-TB patients, including stronger retention activities and improved diagnostic capacities.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
14.6%
2
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.2%
3
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.3%
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
8
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
9
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
13
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
26
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%