Back

Microtesla Magnetic Therapy for cognitive impairment in post-acute sequelae of SARS CoV-2: A randomized controlled feasibility study

Canori, A.; Watson, E.; Patel, D.; Fiorentino, A.; Santiago, C.; Maltz, D.; Gurfein, B.; Putrino, D.; Becker, J.

2026-03-23 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.03.18.26348530 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCognitive impairment has significant implications for function and quality of life and is common in individuals with post-acute sequelae of SARS CoV-2, also known as long COVID (LC). Emerging evidence suggests that sustained neuroinflammation, cerebrovascular dysfunction, and mitochondrial impairment are contributors to cognitive symptoms. Microtesla Magnetic Therapy (MMT) is a low-amplitude radiofrequency magnetic field intervention that has demonstrated anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects in preclinical models, suggesting it may be valuable in the management of cognitive impairment from LC and other neurological disorders. This study is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate MMT for LC-related cognitive impairment. ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of an at-home MMT intervention in individuals with moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment from LC. MethodsIn this prospective feasibility study, 30 participants with LC-related cognitive impairment were randomized (2:1) to receive active or sham MMT. Participants self-administered 15-minute treatments at home with remote monitoring twice weekly for 4 weeks using a head-worn device that delivered a nonthermal radiofrequency magnetic field to the whole brain. Feasibility was defined as completion of at least 80% of prescribed treatments and all study visits. Secondary outcomes included safety, cognitive function, and self-reported mood and quality of life assessed at baseline, post-treatment (Week 4), and follow-up (Week 8). ResultsFeasibility was high, with 100% treatment adherence among participants who completed the study and strong usability ratings for at-home administration. There were no device-related adverse events. Compared with sham, participants receiving active MMT showed significantly greater improvements from baseline to Week 8 in WAIS-IV Digit Span Sequencing (p= 0.026), HVLT-R Recall (p= 0.044), and D-KEFS Color Naming (p= 0.049). Additional measures of attention, processing speed, and executive function demonstrated favorable trends in the active group. Emotional well-being, assessed by the SF-36, improved significantly in the active group at Week 8 compared with sham (p= 0.017), and mood symptoms showed clinically meaningful improvement. ConclusionsAdministration of the MMT intervention at home was feasible, safe, and well tolerated in individuals with cognitive impairment from LC. Preliminary findings suggest sustained clinically meaningful improvements in multiple cognitive domains and mood following treatment. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06739668, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06739668, 2024-12-17

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.1%
2
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
3
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
5
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
7
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
13
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
19
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%