Back

TriGraphQA: a triple graph learning framework for model quality assessment of protein complexes

Liang, L.; Zhao, K.

2026-03-20 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.17.712533 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate quality assessment of predicted protein-protein complex structures remains a major challenge. Existing graph-based quality assessment methods often treat the entire complex as a homogeneous graph, which obscures the physical distinction between intra-chain folding stability and inter-chain binding specificity. In this study, we introduce TriGraphQA, a novel triple graph learning framework designed for model quality assessment of protein complexes. TriGraphQA explicitly decouples monomeric and interfacial representations by constructing three geometric views: two residue-node graphs capturing the local folding environments of individual chains, and a dedicated contact-node graph representing the binding interface. Crucially, we propose an interface context aggregation module to project context-rich embeddings from the monomers onto the interface, effectively fusing multi-scale structural features. We conducted comprehensive tests on several challenging benchmark datasets, including Dimer50, DBM55-AF2, and HAF2. The results show that TriGraphQA significantly outperforms state-of-the-art single-model methods. TriGraphQA consistently achieves the highest global scoring correlations and lower top-ranking losses. Consequently, TriGraphQA provides a powerful evaluation tool for protein-protein docking, facilitating the reliable identification of near-native assemblies in large-scale structural modeling and molecular recognition studies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.5%
2
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
3
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.4%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
6
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
7
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
8
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.1%
10
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
13
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
17
Journal of Cheminformatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.7%
22
Science Bulletin
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
28
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%