Back

Enhancing Genomic Prediction Models In Miscanthus Populations By Incorporating The Genotype-By-Environment Interaction

Shaik, A.; Sacks, E.; Leakey, A. D. B.; Zhao, H.; Kjeldsen, J. B.; Jorgensen, U.; Ghimire, B. K.; Lipka, A. E.; Njuguna, J. N.; Yu, C. Y.; Seong, E. S.; Yoo, J. H.; Nagano, H.; Anzoua, K. G.; Yamada, T.; Chebukin, P.; Jin, X.; Clark, L. V.; Petersen, K. K.; Peng, J.; Sabitov, A.; Dzyubenko, E.; Dzyubenko, N.; Glowacka, K.; Nascimento, M.; Campana Nascimento, A. C.; Dwiyanti, M. S.; Bagment, L.; Proma, S.; Garcia-Abadillo, J.; Jarquin, D.

2026-03-18 genomics
10.64898/2026.03.17.712492 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Giant Miscanthus giganteus (Mxg) is one of the most promising perennial crops to generate biomass feedstock for bioenergy and biobased products. It is derived from the natural inter-species hybridization of Miscanthus sacchariflorus (Msa) and Miscanthus sinensis (Msi) species, thus population improvement within these species is crucial. Genomic selection (GS) is an attractive option to accelerate breeding of perennial grasses, such as Miscanthus, which requires up to three years of evaluation to produce reliable phenotypic data. Hence, genotypes are observed in multiple years and locations causing inconsistent response patterns from one year to the next, between location, and/or location-by-year combinations. These inconsistencies are known as the genotype-by-environment interaction effect (GxE). Although GS has been successfully implemented in multiple annual crops where straightforward cross-validation schemes exist to assess the levels of predictive ability that can be reached, for perennial crops new cross-validation schemes will help avoid data contamination. Here, we propose a series of cross-validation schemes to evaluate model performance for perennial crops. We perform a case study by analyzing one panel of each species (516 genotypes of Msa, 280 genotypes of Msi) scored for biomass yield at different locations around the world over several years. The results of the different cross-validation schemes provide insights about the usefulness of GS to accelerate the breeding process of Miscanthus species. In addition, leveraging the GxE effects of different types significantly increases predictive ability (up to 10% in Msa and 30% for Msi) compared to the conventional approaches based on main effects only.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
4
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
5
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
6
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
7
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
8
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
9
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
11
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
12
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
13
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
14
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
16
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
17
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
18
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
20
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
24
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%
26
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%