Back

Genetic and heat-stress related environmental influences on pig whole-blood gene expression levels

Durante, A.; Feve, K.; Naylies, C.; Labrune, Y.; Gress, L.; Lippi, Y.; Legoueix, S.; Milan, D.; Gourdine, J.-L.; Gilbert, H.; Renaudeau, D.; Riquet, J.; Devailly, G.

2026-03-18 genomics
10.64898/2026.03.17.712411 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGene expression levels are affected by genetics and environmental effects. However, quantification of the influence of genetics and environmental effects on gene expression remains limited, especially in farm animals. Here, the relative influence of genetic and heat-related environmental variations on gene expression levels was investigated in pigs, using a backcross herd of diverse heat adaptation levels. Backcross animals were raised in either a tropical or temperate environment. Animals raised in temperate environment were subjected to an experimental heat stress at the end of their growth. ResultsWe identified 1,967 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between pigs raised in the tropical (n = 181) and temperate (n = 180) facilities, and 472 DEGs throughout a 3 weeks experimental heat stress. Transcriptome-wide association (TWAS) study identified 139 associations between gene expression levels and thermoregulation/production traits. We detected 6,014 expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) associated with the expression level of 3,297 genes. Genetic variance was estimated to explain 36.3% of gene expression variance on average, and was the main source of variance for 27.7% of transcripts. Most eQTLs found are located in proximal regions (cis-eQTLs) and few within distal regions (trans-eQTLs) to their assigned genes. A trans-eQTL hotspot highlighted a hematopoietic mechanism driven by GPATCH8. An integration of GWAS and TWAS pointed to TMCO1 and ZNF184 as candidate genes for backfat thickness. ConclusionsThis study provides a better understanding of the impact of climate, heat stress and genetic influences on the pig whole blood transcriptome.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.8%
3
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.7%
5
Physiological Genomics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
9
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
Database
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Journal of Dairy Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
13
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
15
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
16
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
19
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
23
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
24
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%