Back

Sarcomere Variants of Uncertain Significance identify an Intermediate Clinical Risk Profile in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Choi, H.-M.; Seo, S. H.; Hwang, I.-C.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.-S.; Park, J.; Yoon, Y. E.; Cho, G.-Y.; Lim, J.; Kwak, S.; Park, J.-B.; Lee, S.-P.; Kim, Y.-J.; Seong, M.-W.; Kim, H.-K.

2026-03-20 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.03.17.26348662 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: The clinical significance of sarcomere variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains unclear, and VUS are currently regarded as clinically non-actionable despite their increasing prevalence. This study aimed to evaluate genotype?phenotype and genotype?outcome associations according to variant pathogenicity in patients with HCM, with a particular focus on the clinical relevance of sarcomere VUS. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 438 patients with HCM who underwent next-generation sequencing-based genetic testing at two tertiary hospitals. Patients were classified into three groups: pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants, VUS, and no sarcomere mutations. Clinical characteristics, imaging phenotypes, and outcomes were compared across groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, aborted sudden cardiac death, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy, and heart transplantation. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models with Firth's penalized partial likelihood approach. Results: P/LP variants were identified in 171 patients (39.0%) and sarcomere VUS in 159 patients (36.3%). Patients with VUS demonstrated intermediate clinical and phenotypic features between P/LP carriers and genotype-negative patients. Kaplan?Meier analysis showed a graded difference in event-free survival across variant classifications. While VUS were not independently associated with adverse outcomes when modeled as a categorical variable, increasing pathogenicity from genotype-negative to VUS and P/LP variants was associated with a stepwise increase in risk of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio 2.05, 95% confidence interval 1.11?4.16 p=0.019). Identified VUS were preferentially enriched in Z-disc and giant sarcomere scaffolding proteins. Conclusion: Sarcomere VUS represent intermediate characteristics along a continuum of sarcomere dysfunction, associated with distinct phenotypic features and clinical outcomes compared with both P/LP variants and the absence of sarcomere mutations. These findings suggest that sarcomere VUS may not be entirely clinically neutral and should be interpreted within a broader genetic and structural context in patients with HCM.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.8%
2
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
9
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
11
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
15
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
17
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
25
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%