Effectiveness of the Smoke Free App for Smoking Cessation -- Results of RAUCHFREI, a Randomised, Double-blind, Controlled, Two-arm, Parallel, Nationwide, Decentralised, Fully Remote Clinical Trial in Germany
Keller, L.; Schraplau, A.; Timpel, P.; Schönfelder, T.; Scheibe, S.; Heinrich, R.; Bricker, J. B.; Brown, J.; Naughton, F.; Raupach, T.; West, R.; Pontes da Silva, B.; Schmidt-Lucke, C.; Crane, D.
Show abstract
ObjectivesUptake of evidence-based smoking cessation support remains limited. Digital interventions offer the prospect of scalable and highly accessible support. Smoke Free, a digital mobile application using established behaviour change techniques, has shown promise, but no large-scale randomised controlled efficacy trial has yet been conducted. We assessed its effectiveness for smoking cessation. DesignIn this prospective, randomised, controlled, two-arm, parallel clinical trial with 6-month follow-up, study personnel and patients were blinded. SettingThe trial was conducted nationwide in Germany, utilising a decentralised, fully remote trial design. Enrolment took place digitally after receiving brief advice from a healthcare professional, following guidelines for primary care. ParticipantsOut of a volunteer sample of 1850 patients assessed for eligibility, 1466 adult cigarette smokers who had at least moderate cigarette dependence (F17.2, FTCD[≥]3) were recruited between August 2023 and February 2024; 84.1% (1233 participants) completed the primary outcome measure. InterventionsThe intervention group (IG) received the Smoke Free app including behaviour-change missions and gamification elements, while the control group (CG) received a text-only cessation information app. Both groups received brief advice from a healthcare professional. Main outcome measuresThe prespecified primary outcome was self-reported 7-day point-prevalence abstinence from combustible tobacco at 6 months post-randomisation; secondary outcomes included biochemical validation of abstinence in participants providing a saliva sample (59% of eligible participants). ResultsSelf-reported abstinence (primary outcome) was significantly higher in the IG compared with the CG (283 [39.3%] vs. 182 [24.4%], OR=2.01, 95% CI 1.60 to 2.50, p<0.0001). The NNT was 6.7 (5.1 to 9.8). The effect was consistent with biochemical validation (OR=1.76, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.44, p<0.0001) and across secondary outcomes and sensitivity analyses. The 6-month follow-up rates for the primary outcome did not differ between groups (IG: 601 [83.5%]; CG: 632 [84.7%]; p=0.52). Eighty-four serious adverse events were reported by 75 participants (IG: 31, 4.3%; CG: 44, 5.9%; p=0.53); none were treatment-related. ConclusionsThe Smoke Free app is effective for aiding smoking cessation in at least moderately dependent cigarette smokers compared with an informational app when provided as an adjunct to brief advice from a healthcare professional. Trial registrationThe trial was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00031140). FundingSmoke Free 23 GmbH (for-profit company).
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in vaping trends since the announcement of an impending ban on disposable vapes: a population study in Great Britain 94%
- Moderators of changes in smoking, drinking, and quitting behaviour associated with the first Covid-19 lockdown in England 93%
- COVID-19, smoking, vaping and quitting: A representative population survey in England 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A factorial randomised controlled trial to examine the potential effect of a text-message based intervention on reducing adolescent susceptibility to e-cigarette use: A study protocol 96%
- Changes in Cardiovascular Disease Risk, Lung Function, and Other Clinical Health Outcomes When People Who Smoke Use E-cigarettes to Reduce Cigarette Smoking: An Exploratory Analysis from a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 95%
- E-cigarette use and combustible tobacco cigarette smoking uptake among non-smokers, including relapse in former smokers: umbrella review, systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Data management in substance use disorder treatment research: Implications from data harmonization of National Institute on Drug Abuse-funded randomized controlled trials 90%
- Assessing the potential for prevention or earlier detection of on-site monitoring findings from randomised controlled trials: further analyses of findings from the prospective TEMPER triggered monitoring study 89%
- Dynamic methods for ongoing assessment of site-level risk in risk-based monitoring of clinical trials: a scoping review 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of a Text Message Intervention Promoting Seat Belt Use Among Targeted Young Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial 93%
- Low adherence to existing model reporting guidelines by commonly used clinical prediction models 89%
- The role of the SwissCovid digital proximity tracing app during the pandemic response: results for the Canton of Zurich 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.