Back

A Clinical Guideline-Grounded Hybrid Agentic Framework for Holistic Epilepsy Management.

Pham, D. K.; Giritharan, D.; Oliveira, G. C. d.; Vo, B. Q.; Verspoor, K.; Law, M.; Kwan, P.; Ge, Z.; Mehta, D.

2026-03-23 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.17.26348205 medRxiv
Show abstract

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder requiring multi-faceted management, including seizure detection, syndrome diagnosis, prognostication, antiseizure medication recommendation, epileptogenic zone localization, and surgical outcome prediction. Although numerous deep learning approaches have been developed for individual tasks, these models are typically siloed and modality-specific (e.g., EEG for seizure detection, MRI for localization), failing to reflect the multidisciplinary nature of real-world epilepsy care, where epileptologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, neuropsychologists and neuropsychiatrists jointly interpret heterogeneous evidence to guide decisions. In this work, we propose a clinical guideline-grounded hybrid multi-agent framework for holistic epilepsy management. Heterogeneous patient data is processed through modality-specific discriminative and generative models, where textual interpretations from generative agents are combined with structured predictions from discriminative models as auxiliary guidance. This aggregated evidence is passed to a central orchestrating agent grounded in international epilepsy guidelines, which evaluates multi-modal findings within structured clinical pathways and performs iterative cross-agent coordination for evidence-informed decision-making. We evaluate our framework across two datasets spanning six epilepsy management tasks and also introduce a publicly available multi-modal, multi-task epilepsy benchmark. Results demonstrate that integrating discriminative evidence with guideline-grounded generative coordination yields more reliable and comprehensive decisions compared to conventional LLM-based and task-specific baselines. Our dataset and code is available at URL.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.7%
2
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
5
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.7%
7
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
8
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
11
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Epilepsy & Behavior
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
14
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
17
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
21
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
22
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
23
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
24
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
25
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
26
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
28
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
30
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%