Back

Comparison of Galleria mellonella, Epithelial Cell Cytotoxicity, and Mouse Model of Bacteremia to Measure Pseudomonas aeruginosa Virulence

Valdes, A.; Axline, C.; Kochan, T. J.; Nozick, S.; Ward, T.; Niki, I.; VanGosen, E.; Hynes, D.; Nelson, J.; Garai, P.; Afzal, T.; Amusin, D.; Mitra, S. D.; Turner, T. L.; Cheng, W.; Lee, J. J.; Prashanth, P.; Pincus, N. B.; Allen, J. P.; Hauser, J.; Ozer, E. A.; Bachta, K. E. R.; Chiu, C.-H.; Oliver, A.; Hauser, A. R.

2026-03-16 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.16.712016 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Considerable effort has focused on identifying alternatives to mouse models in research studies. In the field of bacterial pathogenesis, Galleria mellonella and epithelial cell lines have been widely used for this purpose, but the concordance of these models with mice remains unclear. To begin to address this knowledge gap, we used 105 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa for which the virulence had been previously determined in a mouse bacteremia model. A semistrong correlation was observed between G. mellonella median time to 50% mortality and mouse 50% pre-lethal dose (LD50) values (Spearmans rank correlation coefficient [{rho}] = 0.75), whereas percent A549 epithelial-like cell lysis during co-culture showed a weak correlation to mouse LD50 values ({rho} = -0.47). Given the stronger correlation between G. mellonella and mouse virulence, we next examined whether G. mellonella could substitute for mice when asking questions about the virulence of large numbers of P. aeruginosa isolates. Results from mice indicated that isolates with resistance to more antibiotics were significantly less virulent, and the use of G. mellonella identified the same inverse correlation. Furthermore, both models found no evidence for the existence of hypervirulent clonal lineages. In particular, isolates belonging to sequence types defined as high-risk clones were not consistently more virulent than other isolates, despite the known association of high-risk clones with poor clinical outcomes. These findings suggest that G. mellonella can serve as an adequate substitute for mice when addressing specific population-based virulence questions, although conclusions should be confirmed in mice. Author SummaryWe found that virulence measurements in a G. mellonella infection model showed a semistrong correlation with those from a mouse bacteremia model and that this insect larval model adequately detected population-level trends similarly to mice. In contrast, A549 epithelial-like cell lysis during bacterial co-culture correlated less well with mouse virulence. Together, these results support the use of G. mellonella as a scalable, low-cost, and humane first-line model for assessing P. aeruginosa virulence but also indicate that conclusions should be validated in mice.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.5%
5
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
7
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
10
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
12
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
14
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
17
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
18
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
19
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
21
Virulence
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Infection and Immunity
103 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
Access Microbiology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%