Back

Pathogenic Leptospira in dogs and rodents in Tha Wang Pha, Thailand - Prevalence, diversity and linked environments

Jaiwung, W.; Dokhelar, T.; Morand, S.; Chaisiri, K.; De Garine-Wichatitsky, M.; Kritiyakan, A.; Guernier-Cambert, V.

2026-03-20 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.03.16.712015 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human leptospirosis is a disease of public health importance in Thailand, but the animal species involved in the transmission cycle have not been fully uncovered. This study investigated Leptospira infection in dogs and terrestrial micromammals in rural Nan Province, Thailand, and the pathogen diversity. Sera from 95 seemingly healthy dogs and kidney samples from 399 micromammals were analyzed using real-time PCR for Leptospira detection, followed by conventional PCR and sequencing of infecting Leptospira. We investigated environmental factors associated with Leptospira infection in micromammals, using data collected during trapping. Real-time PCR revealed ongoing infection in 8.4% (8/95) of dogs and 10.0% (40/399) of terrestrial micromammals, with 12 infected species including Bandicota indica, Berylmys berdmorei, Berylmys bowersi, Mus cervicolor, Mus cookii, and Hylomys suillus. In this qPCR-positive micromammals, three pathogenic Leptospira species were identified: L. interrogans, L. weilii, and L. borgpetersenii. This represents the first confirmed detection of L. weilii in rodents in Thailand. Infected micromammals were found in agricultural and forest habitats but not in human settlements. Our study demonstrates potential complex leptospirosis epidemiology in rural Thailand, with multiple species serving as pathogenic Leptospira reservoirs across diverse habitats, and some shared pathogen diversity with human leptospirosis cases in Thailand. Free-roaming dogs may serve as bridge hosts, transmitting zoonotic Leptospira from micromammals to humans by visiting both animal habitats and human settlements. These findings emphasize the need for integrated One Health surveillance approaches to control leptospirosis in rural communities.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.2%
2
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
5
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
6
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
7
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
10
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.6%
11
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
12
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
13
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
14
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
16
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
21
Journal of Travel Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
22
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.5%