Back

Runtime Anomaly Detection and Assurance Framework for AI-Driven Nurse Call Systems

Liu, Y.; Concepcion, D.

2026-03-18 health informatics
10.64898/2026.03.16.26348563 medRxiv
Show abstract

This research proposes an anomaly detection and assurance framework. It is mainly aimed at providing a framework for anomaly detection and assurance in AI-driven Nurse Call Systems (NCS) during operation. This study detects abnormal behaviors through simulating real call logs, injecting controllable anomalies, and using a lightweight Isolation Forest model. The final visualization results are presented through an interactive dashboard. Our research focuses mainly on the medical environment, which has characteristics of being delay-sensitive and safety-critical. A distinctive feature of this research is that it can effectively enhance the reliability of system operation without relying on complex deep model proprietary data, while maintaining safety and interpretability. The framework design emphasizes reproducibility while maintaining low computational overhead. The purpose is to enable rapid deployment of this framework on resource-constrained edge devices. Preliminary experimental results show that this method can maintain a reasonable precision rate. Additionally, when detecting delay-type anomalies, the results indicate a high recall rate. Moreover, to reflect the systems performance in real scenarios, the framework detects delay metrics and hourly alarm quantity metrics, and reports Precision-Recall curves and their confidence intervals. Future work will consider introducing time, context features, and explainability analysis modules. The aim is to improve the models accuracy and further meet the medical industrys requirements for auditability. This work focuses on the operational safety and reliability of AI-enabled Nurse Call Systems, addressing runtime failure modes that are underrepresented in current healthcare AI deployments. Rather than proposing new learning models, the contribution lies in a reproducible, interpretable assurance framework suitable for real clinical infrastructure. To ensure transparency and reproducibility, all code, cleaned datasets, experiment scripts, and an interactive Streamlit demo--allowing users to upload their own CSVs -- are publicly released as open research artifacts (Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17767143).

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.1%
2
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.8%
3
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.1%
4
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
5
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
7
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
8
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
12
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
13
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
17
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
18
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
19
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
20
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
21
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
23
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
24
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%