Depression and anxiety as causes and consequences of urinary incontinence in women: a population-based study
Burrows, K.; Tilling, K.; Drake, M. J.; Knight, R.; Palmer, T. M.; Joinson, C.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo examine the bidirectional relationships between depression, anxiety, neuroticism, and urinary incontinence in women. DesignA prospective time-to-event and two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) study. SettingIndividual participant data from the UK Biobank and summary genome-wide association (GWAS) study data from international consortia. ParticipantsUp to 118 526 UK Biobank women with linked health records and up to 1.6 million participants with GWAS summary data. Main outcome measuresUrinary incontinence (UI) and its subtypes (stress, urge, mixed), urinary urgency (irrespective of leakage), depression, anxiety, and neuroticism. ResultsWe triangulated evidence to demonstrate bidirectional relationships between depression/anxiety and UI. In prospective analyses adjusted for confounders, depression was associated with a higher rate of new onset UI (any UI: Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.67; 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 1.55 to 1.81) and its subtypes, with the strongest associations observed for mixed UI (HR 1.91; 95%CI 1.59 to 2.31). Similarly, anxiety and higher neuroticism scores were prospectively associated with UI and its subtypes. In the reverse direction, all UI subtypes were associated with a higher rate of new onset depression (e.g. any UI: HR 1.40; 95%CI 1.27 to 1.54) and anxiety (e.g. any UI: HR 1.28; 95%CI 1.17 to 1.39). Two-sample MR provided evidence for a causal effect of genetic liability to depression and neuroticism on UI and its subtypes (e.g. depression on any UI: ORivw; 1.25 95%CI 1.16 to 1.35). Evidence for a causal effect in the reverse direction was weaker, with modest effects of genetic liability to any UI on depression. Little evidence was found for causal effects of anxiety with UI subtypes in either direction. Results were largely robust to sensitivity analyses. ConclusionWe find evidence of bidirectional relationships between depression/anxiety and UI. Evidence that depression, anxiety and neuroticism are predictors of UI onset has implications for treatment. Research is needed to examine if treatments for depression/anxiety could be effective in alleviating UI. KEY MESSAGEO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSO_LIUrinary incontinence (UI) co-occurs with depression and anxiety, but the exact nature of the relationship is poorly understood because much of the existing evidence comes from cross-sectional studies. C_LIO_LIAmongst the existing prospective studies, only one used a clinically validated questionnaire to assess UI, few distinguished between UI subtypes (stress, urgency and mixed UI), and some did not adjust for important confounders. C_LIO_LIIt is commonly believed that depression and anxiety are consequences of UI; if they are also causes of UI this has important implications for clinical care. C_LI What the study addsO_LIOur study demonstrates that the relationship between UI and depression/anxiety is bidirectional; We found that depression, anxiety and neuroticism (a personality trait characterised by a disposition to experience depression and anxiety) are predictors of UI onset and that UI is associated with new onset depression and anxiety. C_LIO_LIDepression and anxiety are not routinely assessed in urology clinics, and a continued failure to recognise their contribution to the onset and persistence of UI could be a cause of low success rates of existing treatments for UI. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The causal role of male pubertal timing for the development of externalizing and internalizing traits: results from Mendelian randomization studies 92%
- A Multivariate Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Neural Correlates and Common Biological Mechanisms of Psychopathology Spectra 92%
- Integrating HiTOP and RDoC Frameworks Part II: Shared and Distinct Biological Mechanisms of Externalizing and Internalizing Psychopathology 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations of insomnia on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: Findings from Mendelian randomization and conventional observational studies in up to 356,069 women 92%
- Risk of common psychiatric disorders, suicidal behaviours and premature mortality following violent victimisation: A matched cohort and sibling-comparison study of 127,628 people who experienced violence in Finland and Sweden 91%
- Genetically-proxied therapeutic inhibition of antihypertensive drug targets and risk of common cancers 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Inflammation with Depression and Anxiety: Evidence for Symptom-Specificity and Potential Causality from UK Biobank and NESDA Cohorts 94%
- Genome-wide association study of problematic opioid prescription use in 132,113 23andMe research participants of European ancestry 94%
- Leveraging genome-wide data to investigate differences between opioid use vs. opioid dependence in 41,176 individuals from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis 91%
- Genetic predisposition to psychiatric disorders and risk of COVID-19 91%
- Establishing the causal role of intimate partner violence and abuse on depressive symptoms in young adults: a population-based cohort study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Glycoprotein Acetyls and Depression: testing for directionality and potential causality using longitudinal data and Mendelian randomization analyses 92%
- Causal influence of dietary habits on the risk of major depressive disorder: A diet-wide Mendelian randomization analysis 92%
- Genomics-based identification of a potential causal role for acylcarnitine metabolism in depression 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.