Longitudinal Relationships Between Cannabis and Tobacco Use and Symptom Severity in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis
Bai, Y.; Vandekar, S.; Feola, B.; Addington, J. M.; Bearden, C. E.; Cadenhead, K.; Cannon, T. D.; Cornblatt, B.; Keshavan, M.; Mathalon, D. H.; Perkins, D. O.; Seidman, L.; Stone, W. S.; Tsuang, M. T.; Walker, E. F.; Woods, S. W.; Carrion, R. E.; Ward, H. B.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTobacco and cannabis are the most used substances among individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P), but it remains controversial whether substance use drives symptom exacerbation and psychosis transition, or vice versa. We investigated longitudinal dose-response relationships of tobacco and cannabis use with clinical presentation in a CHR-P population. MethodsData was obtained from the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS2) CHR-P cohort (n=764). Participants were assessed every 6 months over two years. Substance use frequency, psychiatric symptoms (psychosis, depression, anxiety, and social anxiety), global social and role functioning, and neurocognitive performance were measured. Linear mixed effect models were used to model the relationship between substance use and clinical measurements across visits, and that between baseline use and trajectory of symptoms, functioning, and cognition. ResultsPsychiatric symptoms, functioning, and cognitive performance improved, while tobacco and cannabis use frequency did not change over two years for CHR-P individuals in NAPLS2. Heavier tobacco and cannabis use at current visit predicted worse anxiety at next visit (tobacco: {beta}=0.178, p=0.033; cannabis: {beta}=0.162, p=0.018). Better social functioning predicted heavier tobacco ({beta}=0.178, p<0.001) and cannabis: ({beta}=0.162, p<0.001) use at next visit. We observed a significant baseline cannabis-by-time interaction, where heavier baseline cannabis use predicted slower improvement of negative symptoms ({beta}=0.159, p=0.0017, FDRp=0.0067) and deterioration of role function ({beta}=-0.046, p=0.018). ConclusionsIn CHR-R, current tobacco and cannabis use predicted worse anxiety at future visits. Baseline cannabis use frequency predicts worse clinical trajectory, especially for negative symptoms.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Interactions between hippocampal activity and striatal dopamine in people at clinical high risk for psychosis: relationship to clinical outcomes 94%
- The Addiction Risk Factor: A Unitary Genetic Vulnerability Characterizes Substance Use Disorders and Their Associations with Common Correlates 93%
- Estimating the direct effects of the genetic liabilities to bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and behavioral traits on suicide attempt using a multivariable Mendelian randomization approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of extent of cannabis use and psychotic like intoxication experiences in a multi-national sample of First Episode Psychosis patients and controls 95%
- Developmental Influences on Symptom Expression in Antipsychotic-Naive First-Episode Psychosis 94%
- Jumping To Conclusions, General Intelligence, And Psychosis Liability: Findings From The Multicentric EU-GEI Case-Control Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychiatric comorbidities in substance use disorders: Sex-based differences in a national real-world clinic sample 94%
- Association of cannabis use-related predictor variables and self-reported psychotic disorders: US adults, 2001-2002 and 2012-2013 93%
- Penetrance and pleiotropy of polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia in 90,000 patients across three healthcare systems 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- An Examination of Sustained Versus Transient Distressing Psychotic-Like Experiences Using Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development℠ Study Data 94%
- Interrelations Between Dopaminergic-, GABAergic- and Glutamatergic Neurotransmitters in Antipsychotic-Naïve Psychosis Patients and the Association to Initial Treatment Response 94%
- On the Proportion of Patients Who Experience a Prodrome Prior to Psychosis Onset - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.