Clustering of major depressive disorder genetic instruments identifies distinct and directionally opposing effects on cardiometabolic risk
Handley, D.; Bala, R.; Casanova, F.; Gillett, A. C.; Lo, C. W. H.; Singh, M.; Barroso, I.; Bowden, J.; Lewis, C.; Tyrrell, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly heterogeneous condition that is frequently co-morbid with type 2 diabetes (T2D), and yet the biological mechanisms linking these diseases remain unclear. We aim to identify distinct biological pathways in depression that may modify T2D risk. MethodsUsing Clustered Mendelian randomisation (MR-Clust), we analysed 621 genome-wide significant MDD variants to identify clusters of variants with similar causal effects on T2D. These clusters were validated, and their causal effects were comprehensively tested against glycaemic traits, depression subtypes, T2D risk factors, and cardiometabolic biomarkers using external GWAS data and the UK Biobank. Functional annotation of these clusters was performed using FUMA. ResultsMR-Clust identified three distinct clusters of MDD-associated variants. Two clusters (MDD1 and MDD2) were causal for higher T2D and its related risk factors, adverse glycaemic and cardiometabolic profiles. Functional annotation implicated brain expression that overlapped strongly with depression-related traits such as smoking and neuroticism. By contrast, MDD3 was causal for lower T2D risk, more favourable glycaemic and cardiometabolic biomarker profiles, and was enriched for gene sets linked to fatty acid metabolism and steroid biosynthesis. MDD1 and MDD2 clusters were associated with atypical-like depression symptoms, whereas MDD3 was associated with melancholic depression symptoms. ConclusionOur findings demonstrate a heterogenous genetic architecture for depression, with distinct biological pathways conferring opposing effects on cardiometabolic health. Understanding this heterogeneity could help tailor prevention and treatment strategies for people with depression at greatest metabolic risk.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Inflammation with Depression and Anxiety: Evidence for Symptom-Specificity and Potential Causality from UK Biobank and NESDA Cohorts 95%
- Genome-wide significant risk loci for mood disorders in the Old Order Amish founder population 95%
- What’s in a diagnosis? A genetic decomposition of major depression 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Role of Inflammation in Depressive and Anxiety Disorders, Affect, and Cognition: Genetic and Non-Genetic Findings in the Lifelines Cohort Study 94%
- Sex differences in the genetic regulation of the blood transcriptome response to glucocorticoid receptor activation 94%
- Neandertal introgression dissects the genetic landscape of neuropsychiatric disorders and associated behavioral phenotypes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex-stratified genome-wide association meta-analysis of Major Depressive Disorder 96%
- Shared Genetic Architecture Between Eating Disorders, Mental Health Conditions, and Cardiometabolic Diseases: A Comprehensive Population-Wide Study Across Two Countries 94%
- Genetic variants associated with cross-disorder and disorder-specific risk for psychiatric disorders are enriched at epigenetically active sites in peripheral lymphoid cells 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide by environment interaction study of stressful life events and hospital-treated depression in the iPSYCH2012 sample 93%
- Shared genetic factors do not account for the observed co-occurrence of depression and autoimmune diseases in the UK Biobank 93%
- Examining Differences in the Genetic and Functional Architecture of ADHD Diagnosed in Childhood and Adulthood 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.